ArticleApplied psychophysiology and biofeedback2026
Just a Minute: A Pupil-Based Machine Learning Approach to Depression Screening.
Article in Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond classification metrics: a psychometric-aware benchmark for data augmentation in imbalanced student mental health surveys.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to develop a pupillometry indicator-based machine learning model for depression screening based on pupillary time-series responses to images. Forty participants completed an experiment in which they were presented with a total of 55 emotional stimuli. Pupil responses to each stimulus were treated as independent samples per participant, from which a total of 45 pupil-based features were extracted. A t-test was performed to compare pupil-based features between the highest and lowest 10% groups, as determined by depression scores on the Korean version of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale. The images were subsequently ranked based on their effectiveness in distinguishing between these groups. The results demonstrated that maximum prediction accuracy was achieved using only the top two ranked stimuli. This stimulus optimization process significantly reduced the number of stimuli and measurement duration to under one minute while maintaining high predictive performance. Synthetic minority oversampling technique was applied to address the severe imbalance between the depressed and non-depressed groups. The model was trained and evaluated using a light gradient boosting machine classifier with group 3-fold cross-validation. The optimized model exhibited excellent predictive performance, achieving an accuracy of 89.0%, precision of 80.0%, recall of 75.0%, F1 score of 0.74, specificity of 93.0%, and an area under the curve of 0.85. This model can effectively screen individuals at risk for depression under concise measurement conditions, suggesting future clinical applications as an accessible pupillometry indicator-based tool for depression screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41870817What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.