Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41870883›Full record

ReviewAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2026

Reassessing Transketolase Assays: Methodological Considerations for Detecting Functional Thiamine Deficiency.

Katie A Edwards

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Katie A EdwardsDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Binghamton University, Binghamton, New York, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thiamine (vitamin B1) deficiency due to degradation, inadequate intake, impaired absorption, or increased metabolic demand remains prevalent in both human and animal populations. In its diphosphate form (thiamine diphosphate, TDP), thiamine serves as an essential cofactor for metabolic enzymes, including transketolase (TKT), a rate-limiting enzyme of the pentose-phosphate pathway. Measurement of TKT activity with and without exogenous TDP provides a functional assessment of thiamine utilization that serves as a surrogate for or complements direct quantification of thiamine forms. Beyond its historical role as a deficiency-screening tool, the TKT assay offers opportunities to interrogate enzyme function and cofactor dependence. Strategic variation of assay conditions, such as higher TDP concentrations to identify low-affinity TKT variants or including or omitting magnesium to assess functional cofactor limitation, can distinguish true deficiency from impaired enzyme utilization or altered enzyme properties. This review evaluates preanalytical variables, assay methodologies, and data presentation strategies used for TKT measurements in erythrocytes and other tissues across human and nonhuman studies. Emphasis is placed on biological and methodological determinants that shape measured activity and responsiveness. Improved interpretation frameworks and thoughtful assay design can expand the utility of TKT measurements as indicators of functional thiamine status across clinical, translational, and ecological contexts.

Indexed as

Enzyme AssaysThiamine DeficiencyTransketolaseAnimalsErythrocytesHumansThiamineThiamine PyrophosphateThiamineThiamine PyrophosphateTransketolaseenzyme assayslatencypentose‐phosphate pathwaythiamine deficiencytransketolasevitamin B1

Identifiers

PMID41870883
PMCPMC13007995

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.