Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41871641›Full record

ReviewJournal of pain and symptom management2026

Second-Generation Antipsychotics for Depression in Serious Illness: A First-Line Augmentation Strategy.

Gregg Robbins-Welty, Mia Pattillo, Danielle Chammas, Karolina Sadowska, Cara L McDermott, Nneka Ufere, Jason A Webb, Daniel Shalev

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pain and symptom management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gregg Robbins-WeltyDepartments of Medicine and Family and Preventative Medicine (G.R.-W.), Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Mia PattilloDepartment of Psychiatry (M.P.), University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Danielle ChammasDivision of Palliative Medicine (D.C.), Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Karolina SadowskaDepartment of Psychiatry (K.S.), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Cara L McDermottDepartment of Population Health Sciences (C.L.M.), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina; Division of Geriatrics and Palliative Care (C.L.M.), Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Nneka UfereGastrointestinal Division (N.U.), Liver Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Jason A WebbDepartment of Hospice and Palliative Medicine (J.A.W.), Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Daniel ShalevDivision of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine (D.S.), Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York. Electronic address: Das2043@med.cornell.edu.

Funding

CoCM-PAL: Adapting Collaborative Care for Older Adults with Serious Illness and Comorbid Depression or Anxiety Receiving Ambulatory Palliative CareK76AG083287 · NIA · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI Daniel Shalev · 2024 to 2026
$729k
NIA NIH HHS K76 AG083287
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Depression in serious illness is common, disabling, and often requires rapid improvement. Traditional antidepressants may take weeks to work, whereas second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) have evidence for faster onset and robust augmentation effects in general psychiatric populations. In this Palliative Care Rounds, we review the general psychiatric and serious illness-specific evidence for the use of SGAs as monotherapy and augmentation therapy for depression. In the psychiatric literature, SGA augmentation improves response and remission rates (odds ratios 1.34-2.93; needed to treat 7-13), with onset of improvement within 1-2 weeks. Monotherapy is less well tolerated and not guideline-recommended. No randomized controlled trials have evaluated SGAs specifically for depression in serious illness, but numerous cancer trials support their safety for nausea, appetite, and other symptoms. Despite the absence of serious illness-specific psychiatric trials, SGAs have the strongest evidence base among augmentation options and may offer meaningful benefits when prognosis or symptom severity necessitates rapid improvement. Low-dose augmentation should be considered early, rather than only after multiple failed antidepressants, particularly when SGAs can also target co-occurring physical symptoms relevant to palliative care.

Indexed as

Antipsychotic AgentsDepressionAntidepressive AgentsDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansPalliative CareTreatment OutcomeAntidepressive AgentsAntipsychotic AgentsantipsychoticsDepressionpalliative carepsychopharmacologyserious illness care

Identifiers

PMID41871641
PMCPMC13088372

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.