ArticleNPJ cardiovascular health2026
A scoping review exploring women's experiences of cardiometabolic pregnancy complications and future cardiovascular health implications.
Article in NPJ cardiovascular health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Women who develop cardiometabolic pregnancy complications including gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), fetal growth restriction (FGR) and preterm birth (PTB) are at increased risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. This scoping review explores the extent, range and nature of qualitative research investigating experiences of women at-risk of or diagnosed with cardiometabolic pregnancy complications. Original research (n = 623) and review (n = 66) articles with qualitative data from women, partners, healthcare professionals and community and professional stakeholders were included. Studies involving women with GDM (n = 342, 49.6%), HDP (n = 163, 23.7%) and FGR (n = 17, 2.5%) primarily explored lifestyle, medical or pharmacotherapy interventions during pregnancy, whereas studies regarding PTB (n = 198, 28.7%) primarily explored psychosocial health postpartum. Risk of future diabetes or cardiovascular disease were prevalent concepts in GDM and HDP literature. Extensive qualitative research exists relating to maternal cardiometabolic health. Understanding women's experiences may guide cardiovascular disease prevention and screening initiatives.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.