Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41872543›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2026

Genetic influences on haematopoiesis.

Michael Poeschla, Vijay G Sankaran

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael PoeschlaDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Vijay G SankaranDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. sankaran@broadinstitute.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0044-443X

Funding

Medical Scientist Training ProgramT32GM144273 · NIGMS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI David Shumway Jones, Jacqueline A. Lees · 2022 to 2026
$14.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM144273
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Haematopoiesis has long been a paradigm for understanding how human genetic variation can influence physiology in health and disease, ranging from the genetic characterization of Mendelian blood diseases to population-scale genomic studies of blood cell phenotypes and diseases. More recently, advances in single-cell genomics and variant-to-function mapping are enabling mechanistic insights into how genetic variation shapes blood cell development. Alongside inherited variation, the characterization of somatic mutations accumulating in haematopoietic stem cells during the lifespan has revealed clonal haematopoiesis as a ubiquitous evolutionary process, with heterogeneous clonal expansions impacting haematopoietic function and disease risk. Insights from genetic studies of haematopoiesis are translating into therapeutic applications, transforming treatment for monogenic blood disorders and promising broader applications. As methods continue to advance, haematopoiesis will remain central to understanding how genetic variation influences human biology, disease susceptibility and therapeutic response.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationHematologic DiseasesHematopoiesisAnimalsHematopoietic Stem CellsHumansMutation

Identifiers

PMID41872543

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.