SynthesisJournal of robotic surgery2026
Colorectal cancer treatment assisted by robotic platforms - a systematic review.
Synthesis in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transcriptomic Profiling Reveals Isoform-Specific Regulatory Roles of miR-196A and miR-196B in Colorectal Cancer Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- The diet-microbiota-inflammation axis and colorectal cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aims to analyze and describe robotic assisted surgery approach in colorectal cancer therapy and evaluate its effectiveness in comparison to the laparoscopic approach. Apart from assessing surgical metrics, such as intraoperative precision and complication rates, the study also explores broader aspects, including the impact on patients’ quality of life, the frequency of conversions to open surgery, and the oncological quality of resections. By incorporating these complementary factors, the analysis provides a comprehensive perspective on the role of robotic surgery in colorectal cancer treatment. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science up to January 30, 2026. All records were imported into Mendeley, and duplicates were removed. Among the1,384 identified publications, 17 met the eligibility criteria. Robotic colorectal surgery (RCS) demonstrated superior intraoperative control, lower conversion rates, and enhanced lymphadenectomy precision, though with longer operative times and higher procedural costs compared to laparoscopic surgery (LS). Complication rates were generally lower in the robotic surgery (RS) group, particularly in major (Clavien–Dindo III–V) complications and anastomotic leaks. Patient-related metrics, such as pain scores, bowel function recovery, and hospital stay, consistently favored RS. Robotic-assisted surgery offers perioperative and functional benefits for patients with CRC, especially in anatomically challenging cases. While its superiority in long-term oncological outcomes remains inconclusive, when combined with advances in molecular therapy, RS may contribute to a more individualized and effective treatment paradigm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41872606What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.