SynthesisInternational urology and nephrology2026
Impact of PSMA PET on the management and clinical outcomes of patients with biochemical failure of prostate cancer after definitive treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in International urology and nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeProstate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) is emerging as an imaging modality with an established role for assessment of prostate cancer. This review aims to evaluate the impact of PSMA PET on the management and clinical outcomes in men with biochemical failure of prostate cancer.
methodsWe conducted a comprehensive literature search of the electronic databases from inception to August, 2025. The outcomes of interest included prostate-specific antigen (PSA) responses, biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS), biochemical progression-free survival (BPFS), and overall survival (OS). Meta-regression and subgroup analyses were conducted to explore the heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the robustness of the results.
resultsA total of 71 studies comprising 9948 patients were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled proportion of patients experiencing a management change following PSMA PET was 53% (95% CI: 48-58%). A decrease in serum PSA level was observed in 75% (95% CI: 65-85%) of patients. For survival outcomes, the pooled estimates for 1-, 2-, and 3-year biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) were 62% (95% CI: 52-71%), 66% (95% CI: 55-77%), and 62% (95% CI: 46-78%), respectively. The corresponding estimates for biochemical progression-free survival (BPFS) were 77% (95% CI: 65-88%), 84% (95% CI: 71-97%), and 79% (95% CI: 61-96%), respectively.
conclusionsThis meta-analysis suggests that PSMA PET-guided management is associated with favorable oncologic outcomes in men with biochemical recurrence, with over half of patients experiencing a change in management strategy and a substantial proportion demonstrating a biochemical response. Nevertheless, due to considerable heterogeneity across studies, these conclusions remain preliminary and require confirmation through more robust prospective evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41872648What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.