SynthesisBMC oral health2026
Oral health care interventions on objective indicators of oral frailty in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOral frailty is a significant risk factor for systemic frailty and poor health outcomes in older adults. While oral health care interventions may mitigate this decline, the evidence remains fragmented. This study evaluates the effectiveness of oral health care interventions in improving oral frailty indicators among older adults.
methodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, CIHNAL, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus for randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies assessing oral health care interventions in older adults aged ≥ 60 years. Outcomes included oral frailty indicators such as tongue pressure, chewing ability, swallowing ability, and dry mouth. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager software (version 5.4) with random-effects models. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic and the χ² test. The systematic review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD420251067147).
results18 studies (n = 1133) were included. Interventions statistically significantly improved tongue pressure (SMD = 0.54, P = 0.004), chewing ability (bite force: SMD = 0.40, P = 0.04, masticatory performance: SMD = 0.61, P = 0.03), swallowing ability (objective swallowing physiology: SMD = 0.51, P = 0.003), and dry mouth (MD = 0.13, P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses indicated differential effects based on intervention type and duration.
conclusionOral health care interventions, particularly oral exercises, may effectively improve oral frailty indicators in older adults. In clinical practice, the most evidence-based interventions should be prioritized and tailored to individual responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.