Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41872995›Full record

ReviewFEBS open bio2026

Digital twins to accelerate target identification and drug development for immune-mediated disorders.

Anna Niarakis, Philippe Moingeon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in FEBS open bio, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anna NiarakisComputational System Biology Team, Laboratory of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, Centre for Integrative Biology, CNRS, Toulouse University, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9687-7426
Philippe MoingeonUFR Pharmacy, Paris Saclay University, Orsay, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2380-9983

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune-related/mediated disorders (IDs) comprise a very diverse group of diseases affecting millions worldwide. The complexity and heterogeneity of IDs, coupled with individual variability in immune system responses, create multiple challenges for developing targeted therapies. These challenges often result in prolonged diagnostic timelines, higher treatment costs, and frequent failures in clinical trials. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and digital twin (DT) technology offer promising solutions to support and accelerate drug discovery and development for these conditions, with anticipated substantial improvement in success rates. As virtual replicas of biological systems, DTs can be constructed using multimodal data sources, including multi-omics, molecular profiling, imaging and clinical records. These in silico tools can accelerate precision medicine by identifying relevant drug targets, designing personalised treatments and predicting individual immune responses to drug candidates. Here, we review the current landscape of DTs supporting drug development for IDs. We describe the concepts behind mixed reality approaches combining AI-based models, traditional mathematical and computational models based on low-throughput experiments and empirical studies. We highlight concrete examples of precision medicine strategies for IDs informed by computational modelling. We also address the benefits, limitations, and ethical considerations of these approaches, and outline future directions for research and clinical translation. Impact statement This manuscript addresses the use of digital twins (DT) to accelerate drug discovery and development for Immune-mediated Disorders. It provides a comprehensive overview of the field and helps clarify complex concepts. Furthermore, it provides concrete examples of DT applications on immune-mediated disorders, and discusses perspectives, and current challenges.

Indexed as

Drug DevelopmentDrug DiscoveryImmune System DiseasesArtificial IntelligenceDigital HealthHumansPrecision Medicineartificial intelligencecomputational biologydigital twindrug developmentprecision medicinevirtual patient

Identifiers

PMID41872995
PMCPMC13238663

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.