Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41873251›Full record

ArticleRheumatology advances in practice2026

Unmet needs in patients with RA judged in remission by the rheumatologist: a semi-structured interview study.

Elias De Meyst, Marine Piessens, Jeannine Engelen, Delphine Bertrand, Michaël Doumen, Nicolas Degryse, Nele Verbeuren, René Westhovens, Patrick Verschueren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology advances in practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Elias De MeystDepartment of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7960-006X
Marine PiessensDepartment of Rheumatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Jeannine EngelenRA Liga vzw, Herentals, Belgium.
Delphine BertrandDepartment of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Michaël DoumenDepartment of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6073-7635
Nicolas DegryseDepartment of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Nele VerbeurenDepartment of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
René WesthovensDepartment of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Patrick VerschuerenDepartment of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0340-3580

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To map unmet care needs in patients with RA who are in remission, investigate perceptions on the cause and impact of such needs and explore experiences and beliefs about suitable care strategies to address these issues. Methods: Individual in-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted in patients with RA judged in remission by rheumatologists until data saturation. Qualitative data analysis was performed according to a guide, based on the constant comparative method. Results: Seventeen patient interviews were included for analysis. Patients identified a variety of persistent symptoms, like fatigue or anxiety, despite being judged in remission, reporting a substantial impact on different life domains. Multiple issues were found to be coexistent, reinforcing each other. Uncertainty thrived in patients regarding the aetiology of their persistent problems, with symptoms often attributed to undetectable inflammation. Furthermore, patients were unsure which additional care strategies could be of help. Often, rheumatologists were perceived to give insufficient attention to the unmet needs of patients. Patients recognized the potential benefits of receiving support from a multidisciplinary team, but identified important barriers limiting engagement with such care, including a lack of knowledge on the team's availability and competences. Care was preferred to be tailored to individual needs and encouraging. Conclusion: Our findings emphasize that unmet needs in patients with RA in remission require and deserve additional attention. Although some barriers were identified, patients recognized the potential benefits of receiving multidisciplinary support. In this regard, complementary care should be needs-based, flexible and empowering.

Indexed as

disease burdendisease impactpatient perspectivequalitative researchRA

Identifiers

PMID41873251
PMCPMC13006061

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.