Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41873276›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Digital Medicine and Artificial Intelligence in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Current Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions.

Chingiz Asadov, Aytan Shirinova, Zohra Alimirzoyeva, Aypara Hasanova

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chingiz AsadovHematology, National Hematology and Transfusiology Center, Baku, AZE.
Aytan ShirinovaHematology, National Hematology and Transfusiology Center, Baku, AZE.
Zohra AlimirzoyevaHematology, National Hematology and Transfusiology Center, Baku, AZE.
Aypara HasanovaGenetics, National Hematology and Transfusiology Center, Baku, AZE.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has become a paradigm for targeted therapy with BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, the growing volume and complexity of clinical, molecular, and imaging data challenge traditional decision-making based on static risk scores. Digital health technologies and artificial intelligence (AI) offer new opportunities to enhance diagnosis, risk stratification, and treatment personalization in CML. This narrative review is based on a focused literature search in PubMed/MEDLINE and Web of Science (2010-2025), combined with expert selection of pivotal studies in CML, digital health, and AI. We included peer-reviewed original research and reviews describing applications of digitalization, AI, or machine learning (ML) in CML or closely related hematologic malignancies, as well as key publications on ethics, regulation, patient perspectives, and ML operations (MLDevOps). We summarize the integration of electronic health records, telemedicine, networked registries, and real-world evidence as a foundation for AI in CML. We review AI/ML applications in diagnostic hematology (cytomorphology, flow cytometry, cytogenetics, histopathology), prognostic modeling, molecular response monitoring (including automated BCR-ABL1 trend analysis and ghost cytometry), drug discovery, and clinical decision support systems (CDSS). Multimodal ML frameworks that integrate clinical, imaging, histopathological, and genomic data enable more precise disease classification and outcome prediction. At the same time, we discuss challenges related to data quality, algorithmic bias, model transparency, regulatory oversight, and patient trust, emphasizing the need for robust validation and MLDevOps infrastructure. AI has the potential to substantially improve CML diagnosis, prognostication, and treatment selection and to support innovative approaches such as treatment-free remission and rational drug design. However, technical sophistication alone is insufficient. Safe and effective clinical integration of AI in CML will require rigorous multicenter validation, continuous performance monitoring, explainable models aligned with ELN guidelines, appropriate regulatory frameworks, and patient-centered implementation strategies. Under these conditions, AI can become a key enabler of truly personalized, evidence-based, and patient-centered care in CML.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencechronic myeloid leukemiaclinical decision support systemsdigital healthghost cytometrymachine learningmldevopsmolecular response monitoringprecision medicinereal-world evidence

Identifiers

PMID41873276
PMCPMC13005942

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.