ReviewCureus2026
Digital Medicine and Artificial Intelligence in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Current Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence for Personalized Management of Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has become a paradigm for targeted therapy with BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, the growing volume and complexity of clinical, molecular, and imaging data challenge traditional decision-making based on static risk scores. Digital health technologies and artificial intelligence (AI) offer new opportunities to enhance diagnosis, risk stratification, and treatment personalization in CML. This narrative review is based on a focused literature search in PubMed/MEDLINE and Web of Science (2010-2025), combined with expert selection of pivotal studies in CML, digital health, and AI. We included peer-reviewed original research and reviews describing applications of digitalization, AI, or machine learning (ML) in CML or closely related hematologic malignancies, as well as key publications on ethics, regulation, patient perspectives, and ML operations (MLDevOps). We summarize the integration of electronic health records, telemedicine, networked registries, and real-world evidence as a foundation for AI in CML. We review AI/ML applications in diagnostic hematology (cytomorphology, flow cytometry, cytogenetics, histopathology), prognostic modeling, molecular response monitoring (including automated BCR-ABL1 trend analysis and ghost cytometry), drug discovery, and clinical decision support systems (CDSS). Multimodal ML frameworks that integrate clinical, imaging, histopathological, and genomic data enable more precise disease classification and outcome prediction. At the same time, we discuss challenges related to data quality, algorithmic bias, model transparency, regulatory oversight, and patient trust, emphasizing the need for robust validation and MLDevOps infrastructure. AI has the potential to substantially improve CML diagnosis, prognostication, and treatment selection and to support innovative approaches such as treatment-free remission and rational drug design. However, technical sophistication alone is insufficient. Safe and effective clinical integration of AI in CML will require rigorous multicenter validation, continuous performance monitoring, explainable models aligned with ELN guidelines, appropriate regulatory frameworks, and patient-centered implementation strategies. Under these conditions, AI can become a key enabler of truly personalized, evidence-based, and patient-centered care in CML.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.