ArticleCureus2026
Infertility and Hematologic Malignancies in Low-Resource Settings: Challenges and Perspectives.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Infertility represents a significant challenge in reproductive health, with implications extending beyond individual well-being to public health systems worldwide. Despite its high prevalence, fertility impairment remains insufficiently integrated into cancer survivorship care, particularly in settings with limited healthcare resources. Hematologic malignancies constitute a distinct clinical context in which infertility risk is especially relevant, as these diseases often affect adolescents and young adults and are increasingly associated with long-term survival. However, standard treatments such as high-dose chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation carry a substantial risk of gonadal toxicity and long-term reproductive impairment. More recently, immunotherapy and targeted therapies have emerged as effective therapeutic options, yet their long-term effects on fertility remain poorly characterized and warrant further investigation. Although effective fertility preservation strategies are available, including sperm cryopreservation, oocyte vitrification, and embryo freezing, access to these interventions remains limited due to financial, structural, and logistical barriers, as well as insufficient clinician awareness. Integrating fertility preservation into routine hematologic care through enhanced education, institutional protocols, and supportive health policies is essential to address this under-recognized complication and improve long-term quality of life for cancer survivors in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.