Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41873917›Full record

ArticleScience progress

Development and validation of an online machine-learning tool for predicting delirium risk in older adults with type 2 diabetes: A retrospective cohort study based on the MIMIC-IV database.

Lang Gao, Guangdong Wang, Xingyi Yang, Yuanshuo Ge, Shijun Tong, Xia Xiang, Chunyan Zhang, Yun Huang

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Science progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lang GaoDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Clinical Medical College of Qinghai University, Xining, China.
Guangdong WangDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7237-3517
Xingyi YangDepartment of Gastroenterology Disease, XianJu People's Hospital, Zhejiang Southeast Campus of Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated Xianju's Hospital, Hang Zhou Medical College, Xianju, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7280-4820
Yuanshuo GeJinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, China.
Shijun TongDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Clinical Medical College of Qinghai University, Xining, China.
Xia XiangDepartment of Nursing, The First People's Hospital of Foshan, School of Medicine, Southern University of Science and Technology, Foshan, China.
Chunyan ZhangDepartment of International Medical Center, The First People's Hospital of Foshan (Foshan Hospital Affiliated to Southern University of Science and Technology), School of Medicine, Southern University of Science and Technology, Guangdong, China.
Yun HuangDepartment of International Medical Center, The First People's Hospital of Foshan (Foshan Hospital Affiliated to Southern University of Science and Technology), School of Medicine, Southern University of Science and Technology, Guangdong, China.ORCID 0009-0004-2342-9843

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ObjectiveIn older adults with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), the risk of delirium is significantly increased, driven by neuropathological alterations stemming from chronic insulin resistance. We utilized artificial intelligence and geriatric electronic health records to create an interpretable online machine-learning algorithm for predicting delirium risk. This tool facilitates prompt identification of high-risk elderly T2DM patients, enabling optimized interventions and improved clinical outcomes.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study identified older adults with T2DM using International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes, with delirium defined by the Confusion Assessment Method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU). We extracted baseline demographics, vital signs, laboratory measurements, comorbidities and clinical severity scores. Candidate predictors for eight machine-learning algorithms were selected using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression and the Boruta method. Discrimination was assessed using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and the F1 score. The final model was interpreted using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and deployed as an online risk calculator.ResultsIntegrating dual feature selection methods identified 14 key predictors and the gradient boosting machine (GBM) model accurately predicted delirium risk in elderly patients with T2DM, demonstrating strong discriminatory performance with robust calibration in both internal and external validation. SHAP analysis highlighted the Glasgow Coma Scale, ICU length of stay and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score as the predominant contributors to model predictions. The model was successfully deployed as an accessible online tool and the accompanying web-based calculator enables rapid, personalized risk assessment to support early intervention in ICU settings.ConclusionsThe GBM model showed strong performance in predicting delirium risk among elderly patients with T2DM, supporting clinically meaningful risk stratification. The accompanying web-based calculator enables rapid, individualized bedside assessment and may facilitate early identification of high-risk patients and timely intervention in ICU settings.

Indexed as

DeliriumDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Machine LearningAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansMalePrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk Factorsdeliriumgradient boosting algorithmmachine learningonline calculatorType 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID41873917
PMCPMC13014011

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.