ArticleScience progress
Development and validation of an online machine-learning tool for predicting delirium risk in older adults with type 2 diabetes: A retrospective cohort study based on the MIMIC-IV database.
Article in Science progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectiveIn older adults with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), the risk of delirium is significantly increased, driven by neuropathological alterations stemming from chronic insulin resistance. We utilized artificial intelligence and geriatric electronic health records to create an interpretable online machine-learning algorithm for predicting delirium risk. This tool facilitates prompt identification of high-risk elderly T2DM patients, enabling optimized interventions and improved clinical outcomes.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study identified older adults with T2DM using International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes, with delirium defined by the Confusion Assessment Method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU). We extracted baseline demographics, vital signs, laboratory measurements, comorbidities and clinical severity scores. Candidate predictors for eight machine-learning algorithms were selected using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression and the Boruta method. Discrimination was assessed using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and the F1 score. The final model was interpreted using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and deployed as an online risk calculator.ResultsIntegrating dual feature selection methods identified 14 key predictors and the gradient boosting machine (GBM) model accurately predicted delirium risk in elderly patients with T2DM, demonstrating strong discriminatory performance with robust calibration in both internal and external validation. SHAP analysis highlighted the Glasgow Coma Scale, ICU length of stay and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score as the predominant contributors to model predictions. The model was successfully deployed as an accessible online tool and the accompanying web-based calculator enables rapid, personalized risk assessment to support early intervention in ICU settings.ConclusionsThe GBM model showed strong performance in predicting delirium risk among elderly patients with T2DM, supporting clinically meaningful risk stratification. The accompanying web-based calculator enables rapid, individualized bedside assessment and may facilitate early identification of high-risk patients and timely intervention in ICU settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.