ArticleNeuroSci2026
Retrospective Cohort Study of 221 Cases of Epidural Per-Cutaneous Peri-Neural Release (Adhesiolysis).
Article in NeuroSci, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLower limb (LL) and low back Radicular Syndromes (RSs) may result from discopathy of the lumbo-sacral spine. Consistent benefits are reported from Epidural Adhesiolysis (EA).
aimTo evaluate clinical and European Quality of Life items (EQ-5D) of Peri-Neural Release interventions (PNR, a modified approach and terminology for EA) among patients diagnosed with lumbo-sacral discopathy associated radicular syndromes.
methodsA retrospective study was conducted by retrieving records of patients e treated by PNR for low back and lower limbs pain between January 2018 and December 2024. Eligible patients were adults who were diagnosed with lumbo-sacral discopathy, stenosis, or Post Lumbar Surgery Syndrome (PLSS). Data on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) adopting the European Quality of Life five items (Euro-QoL 5D) that includes self-ratings of mobility, active daily living, self-care, pain and discomfort, anxiety and depression) was collected before the procedure and on subsequent follow-up visits. Other clinical outcomes included numerical pain rating scales (NRSs), sleep quality, time to pain during activity, and self-reported health scores.
resultsA total of 221 patients were included in this analysis. Of these, 56.6% were female, with a mean age of 45.1 ± 14.7 years. In total, 50.2% of patients underwent PNR alone, followed by 28.1% who underwent PNR balloon decompression neuroplasty. Of the remaining patients, 7.2% underwent epiduroscopic PNR, 6.3% PNR combined with annuloplasty (biacuplasty) and 8.1% underwent PNR combined with nucleoplasty. Significant improvements were observed across all EQ-5D and NRS (
conclusionsThe presented data suggest that PNR-whether performed alone or in combination with adjunctive intradiscal procedures-is a safe intervention, and is associated, in the majority of patients, with substantial pain relief and improvement in EQ-5D both in the short- and long-term follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.