ArticlePsychophysiology2026
Spontaneous Modulation of Alpha Power During a Neurofeedback Session Without Instructions.
Article in Psychophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Alpha power increases spontaneously during a neurofeedback session.Communications psychology · 2026Article
- Non-specific increase in alpha power during a neurofeedback session targeting its downregulation.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Electroencephalographic neurofeedback (EEG-NF) enables individuals to self-regulate specific EEG features with real-time sensory feedback. Despite clinical and cognitive-enhancement applications, the mechanisms underlying the EEG modulation remain poorly understood. Particularly, alpha activity (8-12 Hz) upregulation may occur independently of the participants' volitional control. We previously reported spontaneous increases in alpha power during a passive neurofeedback-like task using pre-recorded EEG feedback. In the present study, we replicated this protocol while implementing an EEG-NF procedure using real-time alpha power. Thirty-two healthy adults observed a gray circle whose size was either fixed (control) or continuously updated at 1, 5 or 10 Hz (experimental conditions). Importantly, participants were not informed of the nature of the feedback and received no instructions for self-regulation. We evaluated the effects of (i) trial repetition, (ii) the presence (control vs. experimental conditions), (iii) the frequency (1, 5 or 10 Hz) and (iv) the source (online vs. offline alpha) of feedback update on EEG features classically targeted by EEG-NF. Importantly, we observed robust increases in alpha power over time independently of the presence, frequency and source of feedback update. The presence, frequency and source of feedback update did not influence the EEG features considered. These findings suggest that alpha EEG-NF upregulation may arise from spontaneous dynamics, such as time-on-task effects, rather than the hypothesized self-regulation mechanism. The assumption that observed alpha increases reflect successful neurofeedback learning is thus called into question. More broadly, the present study highlights the importance of including control conditions and accounting for non-specific effects when evaluating EEG-NF outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.