ArticleArchives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists2026
NeBa - Neglect battery: updated norms, new scores, and guidelines of a neuropsychological battery for the assessment of unilateral spatial neglect and associated disorders.
Article in Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimNeuropsychological tests of visuo-spatial exploration, line bisection, and drawing are typically employed for diagnosing unilateral spatial neglect (USN), but updated norms, including those for left and right biases, are still lacking. This study aims to standardize administration and scoring of the most widely used USN tests, providing regression-based norms and equivalent scores (ES) of a comprehensive set of old and new visuo-spatial indexes. These include asymmetry in the allocentric and egocentric spaces, execution times, as well as measures of productive symptoms (e.g., perseverations) and constructional apraxia in an Italian sample.
methodsA sample of 270 neurologically healthy participants (139 females, mean age: 60.57 ± 12.79 years) completed a neuropsychological battery including line bisection, line/star/geometrical item cancellations, copy of simple and complex drawings, the clock drawing test, and a new representational neglect test. Multiple regressions estimated the effects of age, education, and gender. Non-parametric tolerance limits and ES were calculated on ranked adjusted scores.
resultsRegression analyses showed significant influences of age and education across tasks; both predicted execution time and spatial asymmetry in cancellations, constructional apraxia in drawings, and clock drawing accuracy. Education specifically predicted perseverations in cancellations, while age specifically predicted cancellation accuracy and perseverations in drawing tasks. Gender only influenced line bisection and, along with age and education, accuracy in the butterfly memory test. DISCUSSION: This work provides updated norms for standard and novel visuo-spatial indexes in the assessment of USN and associated disorders, with standardized procedures to guide clinical assessment and support neglect rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.