Trial reportPloS one2026
An interdisciplinary rehabilitation program for adults with dementia-A randomized controlled pilot trial evaluating social participation, loneliness and mental health.
Trial report in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo meet the complex needs of adults with dementia, a team-based, individualized rehabilitation approach may be required. This randomized controlled pilot trial evaluated the feasibility of a person-centred multidimensional interdisciplinary rehabilitation program for older adults with dementia, in terms of follow-up and response rates, and potential short- and long-term effects in adults with dementia on social participation, loneliness, and mental health.
methodsParticipants (mean age (SD) 78.7 (±6.6) years), were randomized to an intervention group (n = 31) or usual care (n = 30). The rehabilitation program consisted of a 20-week rehabilitation period and two follow-ups after 5 and 14 months. An interdisciplinary team performed assessments and interventions based on the individual's goals. Assessors blinded to group allocation performed structured assessments at baseline and after 5, 12, 24, and 36 months.
resultsInitially, response rates in participants with dementia were high for all assessments in the areas of social participation, loneliness, and mental health. Response rates after 12 months decreased, particularly for cognitively demanding questions with multiple-choice options in the area of social participation. Overall, there were few statistically significant differences between the groups in the outcomes over 36 months, but some of the findings seemed potentially clinically meaningful in favor of the intervention group: increased frequency of active recreation and organized social activities outside the home, as reported by both participants with dementia and caregivers or staff; as well as experienced more frequent visits to family and friends; and short-term reduction in depressive symptoms.
conclusionsAssessments made of loneliness and mental health in this study over three years seemed feasible. It seemed cognitively demanding for participants with dementia to answer questions regarding social participation over time; therefore it seemed worthwhile to also ask informal caregivers or staff to avoid data loss. The positive findings noted during assessments and potential effects indicate that it is relevant to proceed further to an adequately powered RCT and conducted in additional geographical regions.
trial registrationISRCTN - The UK's Clinical Study Registry: http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN59155421.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.