Trial reportPloS one2026
The STRENGTH Study: A cluster randomised controlled trial of the effect of a behaviour change intervention added to cardiac rehabilitation on physical activity adherence.
Trial report in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05705310 (The STRENGTH Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The STRENGTH Study: Self-management and Theory-based Rehabilitation Encouraging New Gateways to Healthy-Hearts
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCoronary heart disease is the leading cause of global mortality, imposing significant health and economic burdens. Cardiac rehabilitation, including physical activity, can reduce coronary heart disease-related morbidity and mortality. We tested whether the addition of a behaviour change intervention to cardiac rehabilitation could promote and maintain physical activity achieved during cardiac rehabilitation, beyond standard care timeframes.
methodsA cluster randomised controlled trial was conducted across six community-based maintenance stage cardiac rehabilitation classes. A total of 96 participants (mean age 65.04 ± 8.38 years; 75% male) received either standard care or a behaviour change intervention, with physical activity, measured with an ActiGraph GT3X+ accelerometer as the primary outcome.
resultsNo significant differences in daily minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and steps per day, or any secondary outcomes, including self-rated health, quality of life, and mental wellbeing, were observed between the intervention and control groups at six months follow-up. These findings suggests that the behaviour change intervention did not significantly impact physical activity or health outcomes during maintenance cardiac rehabilitation. This may be attributed to high baseline physical activity levels among participants, and the extended cardiac rehabilitation support provided to both groups, potentially masking any intervention effects.
conclusionA behaviour change intervention added to standard maintenance stage cardiac rehabilitation did not improve physical activity or health outcomes. However, continued access to cardiac rehabilitation sustained high physical activity levels. Future research should disentangle the independent effects of behaviour interventions and ongoing cardiac rehabilitation support.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05705310.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.