Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41875434›Full record

Trial reportHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2026

Heat exposure during susceptible windows of spermatogenesis and sperm epigenetic age.

Carrie Nobles, Timothy P Canty, Pauline Mendola, Lindsey M Russo, Kaniz Rabeya, Karen C Schliep, May Shaaban, Akanksha Singh, Allison M Ring, Rachael Hemmert and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01857310 (Folic Acid and Zinc Supplementation Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01857310 nacompletednot on this map

Folic Acid and Zinc Supplementation Trial: A Multi-center, Double-blind, Block-randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)Ran2013 to 2019Enrolled2,370ConditionsPregnancy, Live Birth, Spontaneous AbortionArms5 mg folic acid and 30 mg elemental zinc, Placebo Comparator: Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Carrie NoblesDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2182-8486
Timothy P CantyDepartment of Oceanic and Atmospheric Science, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Pauline MendolaDepartment of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, School of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5330-2844
Lindsey M RussoDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA.
Kaniz RabeyaDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA.
Karen C SchliepDepartment of Family and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1771-3157
May ShaabanDepartment of Family and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Akanksha SinghDepartment of Oceanic and Atmospheric Science, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Allison M RingDepartment of Oceanic and Atmospheric Science, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Rachael HemmertDepartment of Family and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Neil J PerkinsBiostatistics and Bioinformatics Branch, Division of Intramural Population Health Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Oladele A OluwayioseDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, C.S. Mott Center for Human Growth and Development, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6428-766X
C Matthew PetersonDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Karolina NowakDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, C.S. Mott Center for Human Growth and Development, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9971-0023
J Richard PilsnerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, C.S. Mott Center for Human Growth and Development, School of Medicine, and Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4541-6267

Funding

Exposure to Ambient Air Pollution and Temperature During Spermatogenesis: Impact on Men's Reproductive Health and Infertility Treatment OutcomesK01ES034005 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI NOBLES, CARRIE · 2022 to 2024
$438k
NICHD NIH HHS HHSN275201200007CNICHD NIH HHS HHSN275201300026INIEHS NIH HHS K01ES034005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionDoes preconception exposure to outdoor heat stress during spermatogenesis alter sperm epigenetic age among men from an infertility treatment population? SUMMARY ANSWER: Exposure to outdoor heat stress during the developmental stages of mitosis and meiosis during spermatogenesis was associated with accelerated sperm epigenetic age. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Spermatogenesis is uniquely susceptible to redox stress. Age-related disruption of the blood-testes barrier is associated with changes in sperm DNA methylation linked to reduced fecundity and pregnancy complications. Preconception heat stress may cause similar disruptions in the sperm epigenome, providing a pathway through which high temperatures may impair men's reproductive health. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: We evaluated exposure to high ambient temperatures and sperm epigenetic age among 1,220 men residing along the Wasatch Front in Utah in an ancillary prospective cohort study set within the Folic Acid and Zinc Supplementation Trial (FAZST; 2013-2018). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,

methodsSperm epigenetic age (SEA), the acceleration or deceleration of age-related changes in sperm DNA methylation, was calculated in semen samples collected 6 months after enrollment. Utilizing local hourly temperature data, average temperature and hours per day exceeding the 98th, 95th, 90th, and 75th percentile thresholds for dry bulb temperature (ambient air) and wet bulb temperature (relative temperature with 100% humidity) were calculated across spermatogenesis and susceptible windows of mitosis, meiosis I + II, spermiogenesis, and spermiation. Temperature was modeled using three approaches: (i) Generalized linear models (GLMs) for average temperature by warm vs. cold season, (ii) GLMs incorporating natural cubic splines for average temperature, and (iii) GLMs for temperature thresholds. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Across spermatogenesis, each additional 10% increase in proportion of time exposed to wet bulb temperatures ≥90th (16.1°C), ≥95th (17.2°C), and ≥98th (17.8°C) percentiles was associated with 0.063 (95% CI -0.001, 0.128), 0.121 (95% CI 0.022, 0.220), and 0.173 (95% CI 0.030, 0.316) years accelerated sperm epigenetic age, respectively. For spermatogenic-specific developmental windows, associations were strongest during meiosis I + II (e.g. 0.146 [95% CI 0.028, 0.264] years for ≥98th percentile) and, in spline models, both warmer and colder wet bulb temperatures during meiosis I + II were associated with accelerated sperm epigenetic age (P = 0.028). Associations for dry bulb temperatures were similar, although less precise, and no clear associations were observed when modeling average temperature by season. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Due to reliance on outdoor temperatures rather than personal exposure, misclassification of exposure to temperature is likely. Findings should be generalized with caution to groups with different levels of exposure to and susceptibility to outdoor heat. While we observed modest effect sizes up to 0.173 years for accelerated SEA per 10% increased time exposed to heat conditions, these changes at the population-level may be impactful for downstream impacts on fertility and pregnancy health, and future work replicating and extending findings is an important next step. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsAssociations between high wet bulb temperatures, which capture impaired efficiency of sweating for cooling body temperature, and accelerated epigenetic aging add evidence that heat-related disruption of sperm DNA methylation may adversely impact men's reproductive health. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was supported by K01ES034005 from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. The parent trial was supported by funding from the Intramural Research Program of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HHSN275201200007C and HHSN275201300026I).The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01857310.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticHot TemperatureSpermatogenesisSpermatozoaAdultDNA MethylationHumansMaleProspective StudiesDNA methylationepigenetic agingepigeneticsmen’s healthspermatogenesistemperature

Identifiers

PMID41875434
PMCPMC13231450

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.