ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association2026
Accelerated 3D MRI for ARIA monitoring in Alzheimer's disease.
Article in Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAmyloid-targeting therapies for Alzheimer's disease require regular MRI monitoring for amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA). 3D scans are more sensitive but time intensive; ultra-fast implementations could improve access and reduce burden.
methodsEighty scans from 20 participants were acquired with standard 2D fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) and T2*-gradient recalled echo (T2*-GRE), or accelerated Wave-controlled aliasing in parallel imaging (Wave-CAIPI) 3D FLAIR and susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) at 3 T. Two neuroradiologists graded ARIA-E (edema/effusion) and ARIA-H (hemosiderin deposits). Bayesian models estimated sensitivity, specificity, severity agreement, and interchangeability between acquisitions.
resultsAccelerated sequences reduced acquisition time by up to 56%. Four participants had ARIA-E and microbleeds; five had microbleeds alone. Sensitivity and specificity for ARIA-E were identical (1.00; 0.94-0.95); severity was comparable. Replacing standard with accelerated FLAIR did not decrease severity agreement (interchangeability 1.4; 95% highest-density interval [HDI] -3.6% to 5.4%). Fast SWI showed higher microbleed severity gradings. DISCUSSION: Wave-CAIPI offers fast high-resolution FLAIR acquisitions with comparable performance for ARIA-E monitoring. Wave-CAIPI SWI provides high-quality scans that may aid ARIA-H interpretation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.