Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41876442›Full record

ReviewJournal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea)2026

Synthetic rescue in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Concepts, large-scale genetic mapping, and functional implications.

Ji Eun Choi, Woo-Hyun Chung

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ji Eun ChoiCollege of Pharmacy, Duksung Women's University, Seoul 01369, Republic of Korea.
Woo-Hyun ChungCollege of Pharmacy, Duksung Women's University, Seoul 01369, Republic of Korea.

Funding

Ministry of Education RS-2023-00275966National Research Foundation of Korea
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synthetic rescue (SR) describes a genetic interaction in which the deleterious effect of a primary mutation is compensated by a second mutation, restoring cellular function or viability. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, SR complements synthetic lethality (SL) by revealing compensatory mechanisms that maintain essential biological processes. Classical studies established SR as a fundamental principle of genetic robustness in yeast. Subsequent development of high-throughput genetic tools, including Synthetic Genetic Array (SGA), Epistatic Miniarray Profile (E-MAP), and CRISPR interference (CRISPRi), has enabled systematic identification of SR interactions across pathways of genome maintenance, proteostasis, and metabolism. Integration of these experimental datasets with computational and network-based analyses has transformed SR research from descriptive genetics into a predictive framework. Databases such as BioGRID, TheCellMap, and Mslar further support SR inference and link yeast genetic networks to human disease models. Understanding SR has important translational implications. The same compensatory logic that restores viability in yeast can explain therapeutic resistance in cancer cells. Together, these insights reveal SR as a powerful concept connecting microbial genetics with systems medicine, emphasizing that robustness and resilience are dynamic properties of living systems.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingSaccharomyces cerevisiaeEpistasis, GeneticGene Regulatory NetworksSynthetic Lethal Mutationscomputational predictiongenetic interaction networksnetwork robustnessSaccharomyces cerevisiaesynthetic rescuesystems biology

Identifiers

PMID41876442
PMCPMC13577003

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.