Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41876706›Full record

ArticleMolecular psychiatry2026

Neuroanatomy reflects individual variability in impulsivity in youth.

Elvisha Dhamala, Erynn Christensen, Jamie L Hanson, Jocelyn A Ricard, Noelle Arcaro, Simran Bhola, Lisa Wiersch, Katharina Brosch, B T Thomas Yeo, Avram J Holmes and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Elvisha DhamalaInstitute of Behavioral Sciences, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset, USA. elvisha@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8253-6962
Erynn ChristensenInstitute of Behavioral Sciences, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset, USA.
Jamie L HansonLearning Research and Development Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA.
Jocelyn A RicardStanford Neurosciences Interdepartmental Program, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA.
Noelle ArcaroInstitute of Behavioral Sciences, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset, USA.
Simran BholaInstitute of Behavioral Sciences, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset, USA.
Lisa WierschInstitute of Behavioral Sciences, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset, USA.
Katharina BroschInstitute of Behavioral Sciences, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0526-8095
B T Thomas YeoCentre for Sleep & Cognition & Centre for Translational Magnetic Resonance Research, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Avram J HolmesDepartment of Psychiatry, Brain Health Institute, Rutgers University, Piscataway, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6583-803X
Sarah W YipDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2293-2864

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individual differences in neural circuits underlying emotional regulation, motivation, and decision-making are implicated in many psychiatric illnesses. Interindividual variability in these circuits may manifest, at least in part, as individual differences in impulsivity. Impulsivity reflects a tendency towards rapid, unplanned reactions to internal or external stimuli without considering potential negative consequences, coupled with difficulty inhibiting responses. Here, we use multivariate machine learning approaches (brain-based predictive models) to explore the neural bases of impulsivity. We consider multiple impulsivity measures, neuroanatomical features (cortical thickness, surface area, and gray matter volume, as well as non-cortical gray matter volume), and sexes (females and males) in a large sample of youth from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study at baseline (n = 8630), two-year follow-up (n = 5998), four-year follow-up (n = 4844), and six-year follow-up (n = 3100). Using brain-based predictive models, we demonstrate that regional variations in cortical thickness, surface area, and gray matter volume significantly predict self-reported impulsivity measures, with associations varying across impulsivity dimensions and developmental timepoints. Impulsivity broadly maps onto default mode, limbic, ventral attention, and visual networks, as well as cerebellar and brain stem structures. While many relationships are stable across sexes and developmental time points, others exhibit sex effects and dynamic changes. These results suggest that neuroanatomy is linked to self-reported impulsivity in youth and highlight the complexity of these relationships across measures, features, sexes, and time points. This work also emphasizes the importance of adopting a multivariate and sex-specific approach in neuroimaging and behavioral research.

Indexed as

Impulsive BehaviorAdolescentBrainBrain MappingDecision MakingFemaleGray MatterHumansIndividualityMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeuroanatomy

Identifiers

PMID41876706
PMCPMC13364653

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.