Trial reportOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2026
Phase 3 study comparing the efficacy and safety of proposed biosimilar RGB-14-P with denosumab in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: results from the transition (switch) phase.
Trial report in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteoporosis is a chronic condition requiring long-term management of fracture risk. Biosimilars provide the possibility of continuous use of well-established compounds. Proposed denosumab biosimilar RGB-14-P demonstrated equivalent efficacy and similar pharmacodynamics, immunogenicity, and safety to the reference denosumab. Transitioning from reference denosumab to RGB-14-P was associated with continued effectiveness and safety. PURPOSE: To establish the therapeutic equivalence of RGB-14-P and reference denosumab (RD) in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis through demonstrating equivalent efficacy and similar safety, pharmacodynamics (PD), and immunogenicity when transitioning from RD to RGB-14-P.
methodsPatients (n = 188) who had received two 60-mg doses of RGB-14-P or RD (day 1 and week 26) in a randomised, blinded, controlled phase 3 study were re-randomised 1:1:1 at week 52 to continue RGB-14-P (n = 63) or RD (n = 63) or transition from RD to RGB-14-P (n = 62) and followed to week 78.
resultsGains in lumbar spine, hip, and femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) observed in the first 52 weeks of treatment were further improved up to week 78 in all three groups, including patients who transitioned from RD to RGB-14-P. Incidences of new fragility fractures were comparable. Changes from baseline in serum PD markers (serum C-telopeptide of type I collagen and procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide) were maintained. The transition did not induce a discernible immunological reaction, and there were no clinically meaningful between-group differences in safety.
conclusionTreatment responses to RGB-14-P or RD seen during the first 52 weeks of treatment further improved to week 78; transitioning from RD to RGB-14-P had no discernible impact on efficacy, PD, immunogenicity, or safety. The totality of the evidence on the proposed biosimilar RGB-14-P available to date demonstrated structural and functional similarity as well as PK, PD, and therapeutic equivalence to reference denosumab, which suggests that RGB-14-P can be considered for long-term treatment, as well as a continuation of denosumab treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.