ArticleScientific reports2026
In silico evaluation of FDA-approved antivirals and corticosteroids against SARS-CoV-2.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The work provides computational insights into the binding mechanisms of pharmaceutical drugs Baloxavir Marboxil (BM), Dexamethasone (DM), and Remdesivir (RD) with SARS-CoV-2 protein using molecular docking, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, and density functional theory (DFT) analyses. The aim is to identify strong inhibitors that can be repurposed as antiviral drugs. Molecular docking results indicate that BM exhibits the highest binding affinity (- 8.88 ± 0.57 kcal/mol), followed by DM and RD. According to ADMET profile, DM has better absorption and clearance, while BM and RD have hepatotoxicity issues that call for more experimental verification. While DFT-based reactivity descriptors highlight BM as the most suitable ligand for drug development due to its high reactivity and balanced electronic properties, MD simulations study confirms DM as the best binding candidate showing stable binding with very small RMSD 0.78 ± 0.12 Å, followed by RD and BM. MD simulations study along with binding free energy computations confirms the stability of all three ligand-protein complexes with root mean square deviation (RMSD) values of ligands below 3.0 Å. Many regulatory bodies, including the U.S. FDA, have authorized RD for the treatment of COVID-19 under emergency use authorization (EUA). The remaining medications, BM and DM can be said to show promise as antiviral treatments in the context of RD. All metrics form MD simulations and molecular docking, DFT, and ADMET evaluations confirm their appropriateness, highlighting their potential for additional research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.