ArticleBMC emergency medicine2026
Emergency physicians' perceptions and optimization strategies for diagnostic imaging overuse in Somalia.
Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOveruse of diagnostic imaging in emergency medicine poses significant challenges, particularly in emergency care settings, where imaging practices are often influenced by diagnostic uncertainty and systemic factors. This study explored emergency physicians’ perceptions of unnecessary imaging, the key drivers of overuse, and potential strategies to optimize imaging.
methodsA prospective cross-sectional survey was conducted over a one-month period among emergency physicians working in the Emergency Department (ED) of the Mogadishu Somalia–Turkey Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Training and Research Hospital. A total population sampling approach was used; of the 25 physicians in the department, three were excluded after participating in the pilot phase, leaving 22 eligible participants. Data were collected using a structured, self-administered questionnaire consisting of 26 items across four domains: demographics, perceptions of imaging overuse, drivers of overuse, and optimization strategies. Most attitudinal items used Likert-type scales, and the survey included a single open-ended question asking physicians to identify the most important change their ED could implement to reduce unnecessary imaging. Data were analyzed descriptively using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 24.
resultsTwenty-one emergency physicians participated (81% male, 90.5% aged 20–35 years). All participants worked in a single tertiary teaching hospital. Over one-third (38.1%) reported ordering unnecessary tests daily. Main contributing factors included fear of missed diagnoses (66.7%), consultant pressure (57.1%), malpractice concerns (42.9%), and departmental culture (52.4%). Respondents identified physician education, malpractice reform, and shared decision-making as key strategies to mitigate overuse. Approximately half (47.6%) of the participants self-reported consistently using evidence-based decision rules.
conclusionOveruse of imaging in Somali EDs is common and is primarily driven by defensive practices and systemic barriers rather than financial incentives. Physicians expressed strong interest in structured guidelines, educational initiatives, and audit-and-feedback systems to promote rational use of imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.