ReviewJournal of translational medicine2026
Mesenchymal stem cells and secretome as modulators of neuroinflammation in neurological disorders.
Review in Journal of translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Targeting Microglia-Neuron Crosstalk to Regulate Neuronal Excitability: Novel Translational Approaches for Chronic Pain Intervention.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNeuroinflammation is a critical pathogenic driver in a wide spectrum of neurological disorders, contributing to significant morbidity and presenting a formidable therapeutic challenge. Among emerging regenerative approaches, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have garnered significant attention for their potent capacity to modulate this detrimental immune response, offering hope for conditions ranging from acute brain injury to chronic neurodegeneration.
objectiveThis review aims to comprehensively synthesize the current understanding of how MSCs and their secretome, particularly extracellular vesicles (EVs), therapeutically modulate neuroinflammation. We seek to elucidate the key molecular and cellular mechanisms of action and to critically evaluate the evidence for these therapies across various neurological disease models. EVIDENCE REVIEW: This review synthesizes the evolving literature on MSC-mediated immunomodulation, highlighting the therapeutic transition from cell replacement to secretome-based strategies. We examine pivotal studies elucidating the molecular mechanisms by which MSCs and their secretome regulate glial phenotypes and inflammatory pathways, preserve blood-brain barrier integrity, and modulate peripheral immune responses. Furthermore, we critically analyze therapeutic efficacy across preclinical models of acute and chronic neurological disorders and assess the current status of clinical translation.
findingsThe primary therapeutic action of MSCs is mediated by their paracrine secretome, not cell replacement. Key findings demonstrate that MSC-derived EVs deliver bioactive cargo (e.g., microRNAs, TSG-6) that actively reprograms microglia and astrocytes from a pro-inflammatory to a neuroprotective phenotype and suppresses critical inflammatory signaling pathways, such as TLR4/NF-κB and the NLRP3 inflammasome, thereby reducing neuronal damage, preserving blood-brain barrier integrity, and fostering an environment conducive to endogenous repair.
conclusionMSCs and their cell-free secretome represent a promising therapeutic platform for neurological disorders by directly targeting neuroinflammation. While clinical translation is advancing, significant challenges in standardization, manufacturing, and regulatory approval must be addressed. Future progress will depend on developing next-generation, potentially bioengineered, secretome-based products with defined potency to bring this regenerative strategy from the laboratory to the clinic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.