Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41877210›Full record

ArticleChiropractic & manual therapies2026

The 2023 patient profile and clinical management characteristics at a South African chiropractic training clinic: a descriptive cross-sectional study.

Bevan Leedham, Fatima Ismail, Christopher Yelverton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chiropractic & manual therapies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bevan LeedhamDepartment of Chiropractic, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg, John Orr Building, 7th Floor, 55 Beit Street, Doornfontein, Johannesburg, 2028, South Africa.
Fatima IsmailDepartment of Chiropractic, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg, John Orr Building, 7th Floor, 55 Beit Street, Doornfontein, Johannesburg, 2028, South Africa.
Christopher YelvertonDepartment of Chiropractic, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg, John Orr Building, 7th Floor, 55 Beit Street, Doornfontein, Johannesburg, 2028, South Africa. chrisy@uj.ac.za.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical training within chiropractic education relies on exposure to diverse case mix to develop clinical competence. South African institution-based chiropractic clinics are essential learning environments and providers of affordable musculoskeletal healthcare. Periodic evaluation of patient profiles tracks evolving populations and healthcare utilisation, informing longitudinal comparisons. The purpose was therefore to describe the demographic and clinical characteristics of new patients presenting to the University of Johannesburg Chiropractic Clinic (UJCC) in 2023.

methodsA retrospective, descriptive, cross-sectional review screened all new patient files created between January 1, and June 30, 2023. Routinely documented information from initial consultation to extraction (May–July 2025) was manually captured from eligible files using a structured form, including age, sex, complaint regions, number of visits, and modalities utilised over complaint stages (primary/secondary/tertiary). Descriptive statistics (frequencies, percentages, means, standard deviations) were generated using IBM SPSS v30, with non-parametric tests applied where appropriate.

resultsOf 1435 files screened, 880 were included [54% female; mean age 40.9(± 17.51) years]. Secondary and tertiary complaints were reported in 39.1% and 14.8% of patients. When aggregated across all complaint stages lumbar (41.5%) and cervical (32.8%) regions predominated. Treatment episodes were brief [primary: mean 2.31(± 2.06) sessions, 72% ≤2 visits; secondary: mean 2.88(± 2.98), 62.2% ≤2 visits; overall: mean 4.24(± 4.98), 49.6% ≤2 visits]. Management was multimodal and manual-therapy-led: manipulation/mobilisation (primary: 94.8%; secondary 98.5%), massage (68.1%; 65.1%), and myofascial dry needling (40.1%; 59.9%) used in most cases; shockwave was utilised for 15.8% of primary and 23.3% of secondary cases, while laser therapy (0%; 0.2%) was rare. Sex- and age-related patterns of regional examinations were generally consistent. Age showed a weak positive correlation with the number of secondary-complaint sessions (ρ = 0.151, p = 0.005, n = 344).

conclusionUJCC’s 2023 case mix was predominantly adult, spine-dominant, featuring brief treatment courses consisting of multimodal, manual-therapy-led care with selective use of adjunctive soft-tissue and electrophysical modalities. This study provides an updated baseline for curriculum review, resource planning, and longitudinal benchmarking with other training clinics and private practices.

Indexed as

ChiropracticManipulation, ChiropracticAdolescentAdultAgedChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSouth AfricaYoung AdultChiropracticClinical competenceCross-sectional studiesDemographyEducation, ChiropracticPreceptorshipRetrospective studiesTeaching clinics

Identifiers

PMID41877210
PMCPMC13137630

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.