ReviewBiomedical engineering online2026
Mechanics-based estimation of metabolic cost of locomotion in rehabilitation: A narrative review.
Review in Biomedical engineering online, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The objective of this paper is to explore methodologies used to estimate the mechanical cost of locomotion and evaluate their validity as indicators of metabolic cost within rehabilitation contexts. Aging societies face rising healthcare costs and fewer workers. Remote monitoring of rehabilitation progress may help address these challenges. Because locomotion mechanics are easier to measure than metabolic cost, understanding whether mechanical cost of transport can serve as a surrogate is of interest. We conducted a systematic search for studies on mechanical work or power and metabolic energy consumption in adults under physical rehabilitation contexts. Abstract, full text screening, and data extraction were performed. Ten articles were included. We found no direct relationship between mechanical cost and metabolic cost in the included studies. However, consistent trends were observed: interventions that provided net positive work generally reduced both mechanical and metabolic costs. Similar trends were found in wheelchair propulsion, where mechanical advantage and power assistance reduced both mechanical cost and metabolic demand for wheelchair users. Rehabilitation progress can be monitored using metabolic cost, and given the observed parallel trends, mechanical cost may also serve as a practical indicator, although further research is needed to establish its validity as a surrogate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.