SynthesisJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2026
The effect of perioperative oral carbohydrate loading on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing orthopedic surgeries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionOral carbohydrate loading is a core element used in Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocols and has shown benefits in several surgical fields. However, evidence in orthopedic surgery is mixed. This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials aims to evaluate the impact of preoperative oral carbohydrate loading on postoperative outcomes in orthopedic surgery patients.
methodStudies comparing preoperative oral carbohydrate loading versus fasting in orthopedic surgery measuring outcomes of hospital stay, pain, nausea, vomiting, or thirst were searched in PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus database from 2013 up to July 2025. The review was registered in Prospero and follows PRISMA guidelines. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4 and R statistical software with a random effects model, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic. Risk of bias was evaluated using Cochrane ROB2.
resultsA total of 10 randomized controlled trials were included in this meta-analysis. A significant reduction was observed in postoperative thirst among patients receiving CHO compared with fasting (MD = - 2.58, 95% CI - 4.10 to - 1.05; P = 0.0009) among 3 studies (n = 190). Pooled analysis of six RCTs (n = 472) showed that preoperative oral carbohydrate loading also led to significant reduction in hospital stay compared with fasting (MD = - 0.36 days, 95% CI - 0.70 to - 0.02; P = 0.0391). For postoperative vomiting, data from four studies (n = 268) indicated no significant difference between groups (RR = 0.71, 95% CI of 0.12 to 4.05; P = 0.6960), similarly, pooled analysis of four studies (n = 268) assessing postoperative nausea showed no significant effect (RR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.30 to 1.70; P = 0.4506). For postoperative pain, seven RCTs (n = 512) demonstrated a non-significant overall reduction in pain scores (SMD = - 0.31, 95% CI - 0.65 to 0.04; p = 0.0797) and the subgroup analysis revealed a significant benefit in studies using spinal anesthesia (SMD = - 0.05, 95% CI: - 0.29 to 0.19, P = 0.007).
conclusionPreoperative oral carbohydrate loading consistently reduced postoperative thirst in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery. It also was associated with a modest reduction in length of hospital stay; however, this effect was may not be consistently observed across all clinical settings. Although trends toward reduced pain, nausea and vomiting were observed, these did not reach statistical significance. The overall certainty of evidence is limited by moderate to substantial heterogeneity across studies. Despite limitations, the intervention appeared safe, adheres to ERAS standards, and necessitates further exploration through multicenter trials especially in high risk groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.