ArticleBioData mining2026
Multi-output LSTM-based prediction of postoperative delirium: integrating baseline and perioperative data for enhanced risk stratification in older spine surgery patients.
Article in BioData mining, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionPostoperative delirium (POD) adversely affects clinical outcomes among older adults undergoing spine surgery. However, existing predictive models often neglect multidimensional nature of delirium, including its clinical subtype, duration, severity, and timing. This study developed a multi-output Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) neural network that integrates preoperative baseline characteristics and intraoperative acute stressors to predict multiple clinical dimensions of POD in elderly patients undergoing spinal surgery.
methodsThis prospective observational study included 536 patients aged 70 or older who underwent elective spine surgery between November 2019 and May 2023. Comprehensive assessments were conducted during both the preoperative and intraoperative phases. The multi-output LSTM model incorporated preoperative baseline variables (demographic, frailty scores, cognitive function, medication count, and laboratory parameters) and intraoperative data (surgical invasiveness, duration of surgery and anesthesia, intraoperative fluid management, immediate postoperative medication use). Outcomes comprised delirium occurrence, subtype, duration, severity, and onset timing. Model performance was evaluated via accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and ROC curve analyses. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis enhanced clinical interpretability.
resultsUsing solely preoperative baseline data, the model demonstrated strong predictive performance with an overall AUC of 0.76, particularly for delirium occurrence (AUC = 0.68), the duration (AUC = 0.80), and severity (AUC = 0.79). Incorporating intraoperative data substantially enhanced model performance, increasing the overall AUC to 0.81, notably improving predictions for delirium subtype (AUC up to 0.84), duration (AUC = 0.81), and onset timing (AUC up to 0.87). SHAP analysis consistently identified frailty, polypharmacy, cognitive impairment, nutritional deficiencies, and acute perioperative factors-such as surgical invasiveness, pain management-as pivotal predictors across delirium dimensions.
conclusionThe proposed multi-output LSTM model predicted multiple clinical dimensions of postoperative delirium, highlighting baseline health status as a primary determinant. Strategic integration of comprehensive baseline assessments with acute perioperative data substantially enhances predictive accuracy, informing personalized delirium prevention and management strategies for improved perioperative outcomes in older spine surgery patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.