Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41877995›Full record

ArticleHealth affairs scholar2026

Growing up giving care: economic and educational outcomes for youth and young-adult caregivers.

Katherine E M Miller, Elise M Parrish, Rohini Achal, Regina Shih

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health affairs scholar, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Katherine E M MillerDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6726-2369
Elise M ParrishDepartment of Sociology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8711-8211
Rohini AchalDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6654-1253
Regina ShihDepartment of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0062-6356

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Family and friends play a crucial role in supporting people with disabilities by providing unpaid help with activities ranging from personal care to housekeeping to wound care. Methods: We examined associations between earliest age of first unpaid caregiving episode and educational and economic outcomes by age 60 years using nationally representative survey data from the Health and Retirement Study. Results: We found that youth/young-adult caregivers (became a caregiver on or before age 25) have 47% more caregiving episodes and 244% more caregiving years compared with those who become caregivers after age 25+ years. Compared with people who never become caregivers and caregivers aged 26+ years, youth/young-adult caregivers have lower levels of postsecondary education and by age 60 have lower predicted Social Security value (-12% vs caregivers aged 26+ years and -23% compared to non-caregivers). Conclusion: Growing up giving care is a reality for many youth and young adults in the United States today. Investing in youth caregiving research is critical to help develop targeted policies and interventions to meet their unique needs.

Indexed as

caregivinghealth economicshuman capital investmentyouth

Identifiers

PMID41877995
PMCPMC13008009

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.