ReviewFrontiers in molecular biosciences2026
Protein structure prediction powered by artificial intelligence: from biochemical foundations to practical applications.
Review in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- HighFold4: extending AlphaFold3 to accurate cyclic peptide conformation prediction via custom chemical connectivity.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Epigenetic regulation of metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: mechanisms, metabolic crosstalk, and engineering applications.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- AI-Predicted Model-Guided Rebuilding of the Experimental Structure of Mouse δ-Aminolevulinic Acid Dehydratase.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The three-dimensional structure of a protein underpins its biological function, making structure determination and prediction central challenges in structural biology. Although experimental techniques such as X-ray crystallography, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) can yield high-resolution structures, they are limited by low throughput, high cost, and demanding sample preparation. Likewise, traditional computational methods often perform poorly in the absence of homologous templates or under complex folding dynamics. Recent advances in deep learning and large-scale protein language models have transformed protein structure prediction. Models such as AlphaFold3 and RoseTTAFold achieve near-experimental accuracy by integrating evolutionary information, geometric constraints, and end-to-end neural architectures, while single-sequence approaches such as ESMFold offer substantial gains in speed and scalability. This review summarizes the biochemical foundations of protein folding, recent AI-driven methodological advances, and representative applications in drug discovery, enzyme engineering, and disease research, and discusses current challenges and future directions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.