ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Dosimetric impact of endoscopic titanium clips in photon and proton radiotherapy for esophageal cancer.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To quantitatively assess the dosimetric influence of endoscopic titanium clips in photon and proton radiotherapy for esophageal cancer and determine whether clip-induced heterogeneities affect target coverage, esophageal wall dose, or plan robustness. Methods: This retrospective study included 26 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent metallic clip placement for radiotherapy localization. Photon IMRT/VMAT and proton pencil beam scanning plans were generated with clip densities represented either by native CT values or overridden to 0 HU. Multiple regions of interest, including the clip, 3-mm and 5-mm expansions and their intersections with the esophageal wall, GTV, and PTV, were evaluated. Dose-volume parameters were compared using paired tests and linear mixed-effects models. Proton plans incorporated robust optimization accounting for ±5 mm setup and ±3.5% range uncertainties. Results: Clip-induced perturbations were small and localized in both modalities. Photon dose differences were ≤0.3 Gy across evaluated structures, while proton variations were ≤0.1 Gy, confined to the immediate clip vicinity. Target coverage remained stable, with all changes ≤1% of the prescription dose. Proton robustness was preserved under uncertainty scenarios, maintaining ≥95% CTV coverage. Differences between modalities were minimal, and although a few metrics reached statistical significance, the absolute dose changes remained small. Esophageal wall dose increases did not exceed 0.2 Gy (<0.5% of prescription), well below established toxicity thresholds. Conclusion: Endoscopic titanium clips introduce only minor, clinically insignificant dose perturbations in photon and proton esophageal radiotherapy. Proton sensitivity to local heterogeneities is effectively mitigated by robust optimization. These findings support the dosimetric safety and reliability of titanium clips as localization markers in contemporary treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.