ArticleRheumatology advances in practice2026
Defining quality standards of care in CTD-PAH and management best practices: a Delphi panel consensus.
Article in Rheumatology advances in practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to develop a consensus of expert opinion on the quality standards of care and outline management best practices for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) in SSc and other CTDs. Methods: Twenty physicians and four nurse practitioners (NPs) managing patients with CTD-PAH (including SSc-PAH) from six European countries participated in a modified Delphi panel. Consensus was defined as ≥80% agreement among the physicians. Results: The importance of a multimodal approach to screening and early detection of PAH through combining echocardiography, biomarker tests and symptom evaluation was emphasised. Consensus agreement was also reached on the usefulness and increased access of echocardiography for optimising screening and early detection processes, noting the importance of cardiology expertise for accurate assessment of right-heart variables. Panellists reached consensus agreement on the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to managing SSc- and other CTD-PAHs through collaboration between rheumatologists and pulmonary hypertension (PH) specialists, NPs and patients. Rheumatologists aligned on the usefulness of the DETECT screening algorithm, whereas cardiologists and pulmonologists remained divided, with consensus not being reached, thus highlighting the lack of agreement regarding the relevance of a stepwise approach. Similarly, no consensus was reached on the impact of the new haemodynamic definition of PH in CTD-PAH management, where greater evidence is required. Conclusions: Consensus was reached on key recommendations for optimising CTD-PAH management, including the standardisation of multimodal screening and promotion of closer collaboration between healthcare specialties and patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.