ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2026
Goals in Nutrition Science 2025-2030.
Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Non-Nutritive Artificial Sweeteners on Gut Microbiota and Host Metabolism and Health-Related Outcomes: A Review.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Feature Review on Food Nutrition: Innovative Perspectives on Bioactive Compounds, Consumer Health, and Food Sustainability.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Sports Nutrition: Current and Novel Insights (2nd Edition).Nutrients · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Already in its third edition, the Goals in Nutrition Science platform covers a five-year timeframe per volume, thus spanning 15 years from 2015 to 2030 (1, 2). This period aligns with the Sustainable Development Goals, and, in practice, these 5-year updates do capture major shifts in the field. As the second quarter of the 21st century unfolds, it increasingly appears that much of the widely promoted food technology has not delivered or is not yet ready. Nutrition, food security, and sustainability are therefore best treated as inseparable challenges within complex, adaptive food systems, where progress depends on addressing biology, behavior, markets, policy, and environmental constraints together rather than through isolated, linear interventions. Nutrition science matters because it sits at the hinge between human biology and the real-world conditions that determine what people can access, afford, choose, and safely consume. As food systems become more interconnected and more exposed to climate, conflict, and market volatility, the field is shifting from mainly reductionist problem solving toward approaches that can handle feedback, tradeoffs, and equity in context. Pursuing the goals set out here is not only a scientific agenda, but a planetary health imperative: sustainable food systems must secure current and future nutrition while balancing environmental stewardship, health, and socio-economic stability across the pathway from production to consumption and waste. Overall, the agenda points toward a new chapter of nutrition science that integrates the right level of complexity by combining deep disciplinary insight with better integrated systems approaches, and by mobilizing coordinated action. Johannes le Coutre, Field Chief Editor, Frontiers in Nutrition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.