Evidence mapPaperPMID 41878571Full record

ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2026

Goals in Nutrition Science 2025-2030.

Elliot M Berry, Barbara R Cardoso, Sean B Cash, Alejandro Cifuentes, Maria Carmen Collado, Johannes le Coutre, J Bruce German, Elena Ibáñez, Mark Lawrence, David C Nieman and 6 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Elliot M BerryFaculty of Medicine, Braun School of Public Health, Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem, Israel.
Barbara R CardosoDepartment of Nutrition, Dietetics and Food, Victorian Heart Institute, Monash University, Notting Hill, VIC, Australia.
Sean B CashFriedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA, United States.
Alejandro CifuentesFoodomics Laboratory, Institute of Food Science Research, CIAL-CSIC, Madrid, Spain.
Maria Carmen ColladoInstitute of Agrochemistry and Food Technology-National Research Council (IATA-CSIC), Valencia, Spain.
Johannes le CoutreSchool of Chemical Engineering and Australian Human Rights Institute, University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney, NSW, Australia.
J Bruce GermanDepartment of Food Science and Technology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
Elena IbáñezFoodomics Laboratory, Institute of Food Science Research, CIAL-CSIC, Madrid, Spain.
Mark LawrenceSchool of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
David C NiemanHuman Performance Laboratory, Department of Biology, Appalachian State University, North Carolina Research Campus, Boone, NC, United States.
Igor PravstNutrition and Public Health Research Group, Institute of Nutrition, Ljubljana, Slovenija.
David RaubenheimerSchool of Biological Sciences and Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Michael RychlikTechnical University of Munich (TUM), Freising, Germany.
Andrew ScholeyNorthumbria University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom.
Annalisa TerranegraTranslational Medicine Department, Sidra Medicine, Doha, Qatar.
Angela M ZivkovicDepartment of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Already in its third edition, the Goals in Nutrition Science platform covers a five-year timeframe per volume, thus spanning 15 years from 2015 to 2030 (1, 2). This period aligns with the Sustainable Development Goals, and, in practice, these 5-year updates do capture major shifts in the field. As the second quarter of the 21st century unfolds, it increasingly appears that much of the widely promoted food technology has not delivered or is not yet ready. Nutrition, food security, and sustainability are therefore best treated as inseparable challenges within complex, adaptive food systems, where progress depends on addressing biology, behavior, markets, policy, and environmental constraints together rather than through isolated, linear interventions. Nutrition science matters because it sits at the hinge between human biology and the real-world conditions that determine what people can access, afford, choose, and safely consume. As food systems become more interconnected and more exposed to climate, conflict, and market volatility, the field is shifting from mainly reductionist problem solving toward approaches that can handle feedback, tradeoffs, and equity in context. Pursuing the goals set out here is not only a scientific agenda, but a planetary health imperative: sustainable food systems must secure current and future nutrition while balancing environmental stewardship, health, and socio-economic stability across the pathway from production to consumption and waste. Overall, the agenda points toward a new chapter of nutrition science that integrates the right level of complexity by combining deep disciplinary insight with better integrated systems approaches, and by mobilizing coordinated action. Johannes le Coutre, Field Chief Editor, Frontiers in Nutrition.

Indexed as

food securityfood systemhealthnutrition sciencesustainabilitySustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Identifiers

PMID41878571
PMCPMC13006240

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.