ArticleBMJ public health2026
Associations of somatic and internalising symptoms with school absences: a national survey from Finland.
Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To examine associations of somatic and internalising mental health symptoms with school absences and how experiencing multiple symptoms influences the risk of school absences compared to single symptoms. Methods: The School Health Promotion study is a national survey conducted biennially in Finland by the Finnish Institute of Health and Welfare. We used data collected between 1996 and 2019. Each survey included between 32 439 and 92 227 participants from grades eight and nine (ages 13-17 years). Five somatic symptoms (neck pain, back pain, stomach ache, headache and sleep issues) and symptoms of anxiety and depression were assessed. School absences were reported as excused absences due to an illness and unexcused absences. Results: Somatic symptoms correlated with each other (0.27-0.46), with internalising symptoms (0.20-0.34) and both types of school absences (0.09-0.25). An increasing number of reported somatic symptoms was associated with higher odds for both types of school absences (cumulative OR (COR) 1.73-6.55 for excused and 1.49-4.28 for unexcused absences when students exhibited 1-5 somatic symptoms). Symptoms of depression showed a stronger association with unexcused absences than excused absences (COR 2.37 vs 1.50). Experiencing one somatic symptom or symptoms of anxiety was equally associated with excused and unexcused absences (interaction effect coefficients 0.95 and 0.94, respectively). When both somatic and internalising symptoms were present, COR was highest for excused absences (11.29). Experiencing two somatic symptoms increased the odds of weekly excused absences significantly (OR 9.60). Conclusions: Accumulation of somatic and internalising symptoms is associated with an increased risk of both excused and unexcused school absences. These results warrant multidisciplinary co-operation when planning and implementing interventions for absences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.