Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41878586›Full record

ArticleBMJ public health2026

Associations of somatic and internalising symptoms with school absences: a national survey from Finland.

Katja Melander, Katarina Alanko, Janne Engblom, Klaus Ranta, Merja K Laine, Silja Kosola

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Katja MelanderDoctoral Programme in Population Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8655-7085
Katarina AlankoTurku Research Center for Learning Analytics, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0513-377X
Janne EngblomDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, School of Economics, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5680-0993
Klaus RantaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2370-6626
Merja K LaineDepartment of General Practice and Primary Health Care, Helsingin yliopisto, Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1848-1514
Silja KosolaCentre for Adolescent Health, Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2881-8299

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To examine associations of somatic and internalising mental health symptoms with school absences and how experiencing multiple symptoms influences the risk of school absences compared to single symptoms. Methods: The School Health Promotion study is a national survey conducted biennially in Finland by the Finnish Institute of Health and Welfare. We used data collected between 1996 and 2019. Each survey included between 32 439 and 92 227 participants from grades eight and nine (ages 13-17 years). Five somatic symptoms (neck pain, back pain, stomach ache, headache and sleep issues) and symptoms of anxiety and depression were assessed. School absences were reported as excused absences due to an illness and unexcused absences. Results: Somatic symptoms correlated with each other (0.27-0.46), with internalising symptoms (0.20-0.34) and both types of school absences (0.09-0.25). An increasing number of reported somatic symptoms was associated with higher odds for both types of school absences (cumulative OR (COR) 1.73-6.55 for excused and 1.49-4.28 for unexcused absences when students exhibited 1-5 somatic symptoms). Symptoms of depression showed a stronger association with unexcused absences than excused absences (COR 2.37 vs 1.50). Experiencing one somatic symptom or symptoms of anxiety was equally associated with excused and unexcused absences (interaction effect coefficients 0.95 and 0.94, respectively). When both somatic and internalising symptoms were present, COR was highest for excused absences (11.29). Experiencing two somatic symptoms increased the odds of weekly excused absences significantly (OR 9.60). Conclusions: Accumulation of somatic and internalising symptoms is associated with an increased risk of both excused and unexcused school absences. These results warrant multidisciplinary co-operation when planning and implementing interventions for absences.

Indexed as

AdolescentMental HealthSchool Health Services

Identifiers

PMID41878586
PMCPMC13007135

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.