ArticleThe International journal of eating disorders2026
Eating Disorder Screening in Adults With Williams Syndrome: A Preliminary Report.
Article in The International journal of eating disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveEating disorder (ED) symptoms have been studied in adults with other rare genetic conditions but not in Williams syndrome (WS). This study examined the prevalence of ED symptoms in adults with WS and associated clinical and demographic factors. We hypothesized that a proportion would screen positive for an ED, primarily with avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) or binge-eating presentations.
methodAdults with WS completed modified versions of the Eating Disorder Assessment for DSM-5 and the Pica, ARFID, and Rumination Disorder Questionnaire, administered as semi-structured interviews by trained research staff. Participants also completed a medical history questionnaire. We used descriptive and between-group analyses to examine clinical and demographic characteristics of ED-positive and ED-negative groups.
resultsOf the 86 participants, more than one quarter (n = 24, 28%; 95% CI [20%, 38%]) screened positive for an ED. Adults who screened positive for an ED most commonly had binge-type EDs (n = 15, 63%; 95% CI [43%, 79%]) and ARFID-type EDs (n = 7, 29%; 95% CI [15%, 49%]). Of those who screened positive, 96% reported they had never been previously diagnosed with an ED. DISCUSSION: Our study provides initial evidence of a high frequency of positive ED screens in adults with WS, most commonly ARFID-type and binge-type EDs. Our findings also suggest that, while prevalent in WS, EDs typically go undetected, and that it may be difficult to identify at-risk individuals. There is a need to validate ED screeners for adults with WS to enhance detection and access to care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.