Observational studyAnaesthesiology intensive therapy2026
The fluid paradox: dissociation between clinical and ultrasound parameters of fluid overload - results of the INCIVEX exploratory study.
Observational study in Anaesthesiology intensive therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionFluid management in critically ill patients relies on clinical assessment, fluid balance calculations and, increasingly, point-of-care ultrasound. However, the rela-tionships between these assessment modalities remain poorly understood, with conflicting evidence regarding their correlation and clinical utility. The study aimed to eva-luate correlations between clinical indicators of fluid overload, cumulative fluid balance, and comprehensive ultrasound parameters including cardiac function, lung ultrasound, and the venous excess ultrasound (VExUS) protocol in critically ill patients. MATERIAL AND
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional, observational study in a tertiary intensive care unit. Adults admitted for ≥ 72 hours with clinical evidence of fluid overload but haemodynamic stability were eligible. Assessments included focused echocardiography, six-zone lung ultrasound, and comprehensive VExUS. Correlations between cumulative fluid balance, clinical oedema, and ultrasound parameters were analysed.
resultsOf 195 patients screened, 50 were recruited to the study. The study population had a mean age of 59 years. Sepsis and respiratory failure were the most common admission diagnoses. The mean cumulative fluid balance was 7.1 ± 4.8 L at the time of recruitment. Peripheral oedema was present in over 70%. Ultrasound revealed left ventricular dysfunction in 16%, right ventricular dysfunction in 10%, bilateral pleural effusions in 44%, and elevated VExUS scores (> 2) in 20%. Cumulative fluid balance showed no correlation with clinical or ultrasound findings.
conclusionsTraditional fluid assessment (cumulative fluid balance and clinical signs of oedema) methods show no correlation with ultrasound parameters in critically ill patients. Future research should focus on ultrasound-guided approaches that provide cardiovascular assessment rather than on cumulative fluid balance calculations or clinical signs alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.