ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2026
Exploring Secondary Structure Predictions for RNA-Targeted Drug Discovery: Power and Challenges.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
RNAs are increasingly recognized as promising drug targets, as both coding and noncoding RNAs act as key regulators in disease-related biological processes. However, a significant gap persists between the number of known RNA sequences and the solved RNA structures, posing a major bottleneck for RNA-targeted drug discovery. RNA secondary structure prediction offers the potential to facilitate the identification of druggable sites in novel RNA sequences by rapidly predicting base pairing patterns. In this study, we benchmarked widely used RNA secondary structure prediction tools against a newly curated dataset of ligand-bound RNA structures. We found that most tools achieve reasonable accuracy for RNAs with short sequences and simple motifs, but their performance declines for longer RNAs and those containing pseudoknots. Notably, prediction accuracy is reduced within ligand binding sites, where noncanonical base pairs and complex secondary structure elements are prevalent yet consistently unrecognized by the tools. Consequently, RNA ligand binding sites are poorly reconstructed by secondary structure predictions. This work provides the first comprehensive assessment of RNA secondary structure prediction for ligand-bound RNAs and demonstrates the challenges for integrating these methods into RNA-targeted drug discovery pipelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.