SynthesisBrain imaging and behavior2026
Neurobiology of language in autism: a systematic review of pediatric studies.
Synthesis in Brain imaging and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Language abilities are heterogeneous in autism spectrum disorder. Functional neuroimaging offers critical insights into the developmental trajectory of language in autism, with the potential to inform tailored supports. Unlike previous non-systematic or modality-specific reviews, this systematic review aimed to identify developmental trajectories in autistic children and elevated likelihood infants across functional neuroimaging modalities. Across the included 31 studies, EEG was the most common modality (39%), followed by fMRI (26%), MEG (26%), and fNIRS (9%). Most studies (77%) used passive awake tasks; around half employed simple speech stimuli (55%) while the remainder used complex speech (45%). There was an underrepresentation of minimally and nonspeaking autistic participants. fMRI and fNIRS studies found that elevated likelihood infants displayed hypoactivation in bilateral temporal regions, which did not consistently continue into mid-to-late childhood. EEG and MEG studies indicate that the timing and magnitude of auditory-perceptual and higher-order linguistic processing remained atypical (e.g., delayed latencies, larger amplitudes) from infancy to late childhood. Across modalities, findings were sometimes inconsistent, particularly when accounting for variability in language abilities. We highlight a strong need for caution in generalizing findings and argue that future research should prioritize more diverse samples to better elucidate the neural trajectory of language in autism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.