ArticleActa cirurgica brasileira2026
Cardioprotective effects of the ranolazine in myocardial infarction mediated by stimulation of the endogenous mediators involved in ischemic preconditioning.
Article in Acta cirurgica brasileira, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Different Doses of Ranolazine on SIRT1, APELA, and APL13 in a Rat MCAO Model.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Article
- Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of Tetrahydroindazole-Based Sulfonamides as Potential Multi-Target Anti-Inflammatory Agents.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeHypothesis centered on the idea that ranolazine could induce responses similar to ischemic preconditioning, involving nitric oxide, adenosine, bradykinin, and adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-dependent potassium channels.
methodsIschemia-reperfusion injury was established using Langendroff technique. Thirty-minute ischemia and 120-minute reperfusion to coronary artery to isolated heart were model of myocardial infarction. There were studied the following groups: control (ischemia-reperfusion), ischemic preconditioning, ranolazine (10 µmol/L), ranolazine + L-NAME (30 µmol/L) and ranolazine + aminoguanidine (30 µmol/L), ranolazine + theophylline (50 µmol/L), ranolazine + aminophylline (50 µmol/L), ranolazine + icatibantl (100 µmol/L), ranolazine + bromelain (250 µmol/L), ranolazine + 5-hydroxydecanoate (30 µmol/L), and ranolazine + glimepiride (50 µmol/L) in perfusate.
resultsRanolazine and ischemic preconditioning groups demonstrated cardioprotective effects by reducing infarct size, as well as levels of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), creatine phosphokinase myoglobin (CK-MB), and troponin I and cardiac parameters like left ventricular developed pressure (LVDP) and left ventricular maximum rate of contraction (dP/dTmax). Maximum rate of relaxation (dP/dTmin) was improved. Conversely, treatments with L-NAME, aminoguanidine, theophylline, aminophylline, icatibant, bromelain, 5-hydroxydecanoate, and glimepiride increased infarct size, LDH, CK-MB, and troponin I levels, and cardiac parameters like LVDP, dP/dTmax, and dP/dTmin were depressed. This data provides evidence that ranolazine employs nitric oxide, adenosine, bradykinin, and ATP-dependent potassium channels as secondary messengers in cardioprotection.
conclusionranolazine can be a pharmacological alternative to surgical ischemic preconditioning utilized prior to interventional procedures like coronary artery bypass graft surgery and heart transplantation, offering improved patient compliance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.