ReviewRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
[Soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities-imaging, biopsy planning, and pitfalls in radiology].
Review in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRadiology is integral to the multimodal diagnostic and treatment pathway of extremity soft tissue sarcomas in DGK-certified sarcoma centers (DGK: Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, German Cancer Society), working in close interdisciplinary collaboration with sarcoma surgery, pathology, radiation oncology, and medical oncology. GUIDELINE-BASED IMAGING AND TRIAGE: Treatment decisions rely on guideline- and recommendation-based imaging and histological confirmation by biopsy. When clinical warning signs (red flags) are present, radiological imaging is essential for triage and early referral to a sarcoma center. For local staging, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the modality of choice. It provides crucial information for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment within the sarcoma board and serves as the basis for adequate biopsy planning. MORPHOLOGICAL AND TECHNICAL PITFALLS: Diagnostic pitfalls arise from overlapping MRI appearances, particularly within the lipomatous spectrum and in lesions with myxoid and cystic patterns. A further focus is on avoidable procedural biopsy errors, inadequate targeting, and an inadequate biopsy tract that is not amenable to en bloc resection or that contaminates additional compartments/joints or neurovascular structures.
conclusionThe article outlines a risk-adapted diagnostic approach and provides practice-oriented principles for biopsy planning. It highlights typical problem MRI constellations to avoid misdiagnosis and underestimation of malignancy (grading), ultimately establishing optimal prerequisites for therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41882170What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.