Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41882307›Full record

ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2026

Rhesus monkeys use both eye and head gaze to reallocate covert spatial attention facilitating visual perception.

Masih Shafiei, Matthias Reik, Marius Görner, Nick Taubert, Martin Giese, Peter Thier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Masih Shafiei *Cognitive Neurology Lab, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Otfried-Müller-Straße 27, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5707-2959
Matthias Reik *Cognitive Neurology Lab, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Otfried-Müller-Straße 27, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Marius GörnerCognitive Neurology Lab, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Otfried-Müller-Straße 27, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Nick TaubertSection Computational Sensomotorics, Department N3, Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research and Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, University Clinic Tübingen, Otfried-Müller-Straße 25, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Martin GieseWerner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Otfried-Müller-Straße 25, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Peter ThierCognitive Neurology Lab, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Otfried-Müller-Straße 27, 72076, Tübingen, Germany. thier@uni-tuebingen.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nonverbal cues, particularly eye-gaze, significantly shape human social interactions. Although nonhuman primates reliably follow head gaze, their capacity to use eye-gaze alone for inferring the other's focus of attention remains debated. We investigated this question using a realistic rhesus monkey head avatar that directed its gaze toward one of two LEDs (left or right), employing either eye movements alone or combined eye and head movements. After a randomly chosen interval (range: 50-400 ms) from gaze presentation, one LED transiently increased its luminance to near-threshold levels. Rhesus monkeys were trained to detect and report this luminance change via a saccade to the corresponding LED, independent of the avatar's gaze direction, to receive rewards. Our results showed that head-gaze cues robustly directed covert attention toward gaze-congruent targets with short delays, indicative of reflex-like, stimulus-driven orienting. In contrast, eye-gaze alone, at comparable amplitudes, did not affect attentional shifts. However, increasing the avatar's size and eye-gaze amplitude, simulating a close-range interaction, made eye-gaze cues effective in guiding attention. These findings demonstrate that rhesus monkeys possess the capacity to use eye-gaze cues to determine conspecifics' attentional targets, and validate and underscore the utility of 3D animal models as powerful tools for generating realistic yet precisely controlled stimuli. Our study supports the idea that eye-gaze following is not uniquely human but is an evolutionarily ancient ability, likely shared across Old World monkeys and apes that diverged more than 30 million years ago.

Indexed as

AttentionEye MovementsFixation, OcularHead MovementsSpace PerceptionVisual PerceptionAnimalsAvatarCuesFemaleMacaca mulattaMalePhotic StimulationCovert attentionGaze-followingGaze perceptionSocial attentionVisual spatial attention

Identifiers

PMID41882307
PMCPMC13260114

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.