Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41883176›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2026

Age-dependent Phylodynamics with Application to Single-cell Lineage Trees.

Nicola Mulberry, Julia Pilarski, Jana Dinger, Tanja Stadler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nicola MulberryDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zürich, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1465-8001
Julia PilarskiDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zürich, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0002-5066-4748
Jana DingerDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zürich, Basel, Switzerland.
Tanja StadlerDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zürich, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6431-535X

Funding

European Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As novel technologies for single-cell lineage tracing emerge, phylogenetic and phylodynamic tools are increasingly being used to study developmental processes. However, traditional phylodynamic methods rely on assumptions that are difficult to justify in developmental contexts. We present a generalization of the birth-death phylodynamic model to an age-dependent phylodynamic model. This method captures a key feature of development: due to cells dividing after characteristic generation times rather than after exponential waiting times, empirical cell lineage trees deviate from phylogenies generated under a birth-death model. By applying our method to a public dataset of stem cell colonies, we show how previous estimates of the underlying population-dynamic parameters were biased by the choice of a birth-death tree prior. We additionally showcase our method on embryonic lineage trees of an arthropod limb, demonstrating that age-dependence appears to be a common feature of development. Beyond developmental biology, our framework provides an approach for analyzing systems where classical birth-death assumptions may be violated or where empirical tree shapes are poorly captured by those expected under standard phylodynamic models. Our method is available as a BEAST2 package.

Indexed as

Cell LineagePhylogenySingle-Cell AnalysisAnimals

Identifiers

PMID41883176
PMCPMC13049366

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.