ReviewWorld journal of critical care medicine2026
Minimizing hospital acquired intensive care unit infections: A focus on prevention.
Review in World journal of critical care medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in intensive care units (ICUs), largely driven by invasive devices, immunosuppression, and prolonged hospitalization. Despite available guidelines, prevention strategies remain inconsistently applied across settings. This narrative review synthesized evidence from PubMed (2020-2025) and key guideline documents (World Health Organization, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Infectious Diseases Society of America, Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America), focusing on staff-level, patient-level, and systemic interventions for ICU infection prevention. Eligible sources included systematic reviews, clinical trials, consensus statements, and implementation studies. Effective staff-level strategies include strict hand hygiene, correct use of personal protective equipment, vaccination, and decontamination of personal devices, supported by audits and feedback. Patient-level care bundles targeting ventilator-associated pneumonia, central line-associated bloodstream infection, and catheter-associated urinary tract infection reduce device-related complications, though real-world adherence varies. Systemic measures such as closed ICU models, adequate nurse-to-patient ratios, triage protocols, and single-patient rooms, further mitigate infection risks. Implementation barriers include resource limitations, compliance gaps, and ethical considerations regarding futile care. Preventing ICU-acquired infections requires coordinated, multifaceted strategies embedded into daily practice. Sustained progress depends on leadership, continuous education, auditing, and adaptation of international frameworks to local contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.