ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Development and evaluation of an artificial intelligence-based electrocardiogram prediction model for emergency chest pain patients.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence-Based Electrocardiography for the Detection of Heart Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Rapid triage and etiological differentiation are critical for patients with acute chest pain in the emergency department. The 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG), as a non-invasive, readily available, and cost-effective diagnostic modality, provides immediate information and serves as the first-line tool for clinical evaluation. However, ECG interpretation remains highly dependent on clinician expertise and is subject to inter-observer variability. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based analytical methods can deliver automated, consistent, and real-time assessment, thereby potentially enhancing diagnostic accuracy and facilitating timely clinical decision-making. Methods: This study included 1,188 patients with acute chest pain who visited the emergency department in the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, between March 2024 and March 2025. Standard 12-lead ECGs, clinical information, and final diagnoses were collected. After data preprocessing, a convolutional neural network (CNN) incorporating a channel attention mechanism was developed and trained. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, area under the curve (AUC), and confusion matrices. Additionally, a blinded comparative evaluation was conducted against expert cardiologists. Results: The model demonstrated excellent discriminative capability for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), with AUC values of 0.986 and 0.916, respectively. For STEMI, all performance metrics indicated superior diagnostic accuracy, and inference time was significantly shorter than manual interpretation (0.24 ± 0.08 s, Conclusions: The deep learning model based on 12-lead ECGs enables rapid and reliable detection of STEMI and NSTEMI, highlighting its potential as a valuable clinical decision-support tool in emergency department. Nevertheless, the recognition of UA and AD remains limited due to non-specific or transient electrophysiological features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.