ReviewInternational journal of nanomedicine2026
Cardiotoxicity Challenges in Nanomaterial: Risk Assessment, Mechanisms, and Mitigation Strategies.
Review in International journal of nanomedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The growing use of nanomaterials (NMs) in consumer, medical and industrial products raises significant concerns about human exposure and the risk of cardiovascular toxicity. This narrative review synthesizes three critical and interconnected aspects of nanomaterial-induced cardiotoxicity-risk assessment models, mechanisms, and mitigation strategies-with the overarching goal of advancing fundamental knowledge and supporting the development of safer NMs. A variety of assessment models are explored, ranging from traditional in vitro and in vivo systems to emerging organ-on-a-chip platforms. A tiered, decision-driven strategy for model selection is based on risk-stage, objective-orientation, evidence complementarity, and ethical optimization, with emphasis on the critical need to assess toxicity under pathological conditions. Key mechanisms include oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, inflammatory responses, disruption of ion homeostasis, and induction of cell death. The specific pathway is often dictated by the physicochemical properties of nanoparticle. Potential mitigation strategies include surface engineering, elemental substitution/doping, morphological design, the use of chelating agents/antioxidants, and adopting Safe-by-Design principles. Interdisciplinary collaboration is crucial during the developmental phase to balance the immense application potential of NMs with the imperative to address their associated toxicity challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.