ReviewInternational journal of nanomedicine2026
Current Research on Aloe-Derived Extracellular Vesicles in Injury Repair.
Review in International journal of nanomedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Recent progress of plant-derived extracellular vesicle-like nanoparticles integrated with biomaterials for skin repair.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, plant-derived extracellular vesicle-like nanoparticles have garnered significant interest as promising therapeutic agents and delivery vehicles, owing to their biocompatibility and multifaceted bioactivity. Among these, extracellular vesicles derived from Aloe species (A-EVs) have shown considerable potential in promoting tissue repair. However, a consolidated overview linking their physicochemical properties to in vivo reparative functions and clinical translatability is still lacking. This review systematically summarizes current methods for isolating and characterizing A-EVs, highlighting the technical variability that challenges standardization. Evidence is synthesized demonstrating that A-EVs facilitate injury repair through integrated mechanisms, including potent antioxidant effects via Nrf2/HO-1 pathway activation, anti-inflammatory action via macrophage polarization and NF-κB suppression, and the promotion of cellular proliferation and migration. Notably, emerging research reveals their unique capacity to induce immunogenic cell death (eg, pyroptosis) in diseased tissues, setting them apart from many other plant EV sources. Compared to EVs from other medicinal plants, A-EVs offer a distinctive combination of anthraquinone-enriched cargo, pro-healing protein profiles, and mucoadhesive properties, making them particularly suited for wound and gastrointestinal repair. Despite low immunogenicity and a natural propensity for drug encapsulation, major hurdles-such as scalable production, pharmacokinetic profiling, and rigorous safety assessment-must be overcome to advance clinical translation. By critically evaluating recent progress and existing gaps, this review clarifies the mechanistic basis for A-EVs' reparative effects and provides a rationale for their future development as standardized, next-generation nanotherapeutics for regenerative medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.