Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41884293›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience2026

Sex differences in taste neophobia and conditioned aversion across fluid administration methods.

Ron Gerbi, Oran Rahamim, Elor Arieli, Amit Worcel, Anan Moran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ron GerbiDepartment of Neurobiology, School of Neurobiology, Biochemistry & Biophysics, The George S. Wise Faculty of Life Science, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Oran RahamimDepartment of Neurobiology, School of Neurobiology, Biochemistry & Biophysics, The George S. Wise Faculty of Life Science, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Elor ArieliDepartment of Neurobiology, School of Neurobiology, Biochemistry & Biophysics, The George S. Wise Faculty of Life Science, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Amit WorcelDepartment of Neurobiology, School of Neurobiology, Biochemistry & Biophysics, The George S. Wise Faculty of Life Science, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Anan MoranDepartment of Neurobiology, School of Neurobiology, Biochemistry & Biophysics, The George S. Wise Faculty of Life Science, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rodent studies of the taste system commonly employ two methods of taste administration (MOA): active licking from spouts or intra-oral cannula (IOC) deliveries. While bottle drinking preserves natural consumption behavior, IOC administration, where animals receive liquids passively into their oral cavity, provides precise temporal control of stimulus delivery but limits the reliability of measuring voluntary intake and hedonic response. To overcome these limitations, a third method, nose-poke for IOC delivery (NP-IOC), was introduced. In NP-IOC, each taste is delivered through the IOC following an active nose poke, thus combining voluntary decision-making with temporal precision. Whether NP-IOC preserves natural taste-guided behavior, however, remains unknown. Here, we examined how NP-IOC affects taste neophobia (the reluctance to consume novel tastes) and conditioned taste aversion (CTA, avoidance of a taste paired with malaise). Rats received water either

Indexed as

conditioned taste aversiondecision makingfood administrationlearningneophobiaratsex differencestaste

Identifiers

PMID41884293
PMCPMC13010316

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.