Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41884304›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2026

Artificial intelligence models for point-of-care ultrasound diagnostics in dogs.

Ricardo Martinez, Krysta Lynn Amezcua, Sofia I Hernandez Torres, Theodore Winter, Igor Yankin, Emilee Venn, Eric J Snider, Thomas Edwards

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ricardo Martinez *Texas A&M College of Veterinary Medicine & Biomedical Sciences, College Station, TX, United States.
Krysta Lynn Amezcua *US Army Institute of Surgical Research, Joint Base San Antonio-Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, TX, United States.
Sofia I Hernandez TorresUS Army Institute of Surgical Research, Joint Base San Antonio-Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, TX, United States.
Theodore WinterUS Army Institute of Surgical Research, Joint Base San Antonio-Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, TX, United States.
Igor YankinTexas A&M College of Veterinary Medicine & Biomedical Sciences, College Station, TX, United States.
Emilee VennUS Army Institute of Surgical Research, Joint Base San Antonio-Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, TX, United States.
Eric J SniderUS Army Institute of Surgical Research, Joint Base San Antonio-Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, TX, United States.
Thomas EdwardsTexas A&M College of Veterinary Medicine & Biomedical Sciences, College Station, TX, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) for the purpose of Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) is an essential diagnostic tool for triage in canine patients, but its accuracy is highly operator-dependent. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers a potential solution for improving diagnostic capability by providing real-time, automated interpretation of ultrasound images, particularly in resource-limited or pre-hospital settings. This study evaluated the feasibility and diagnostic performance of deep learning models for detecting life-threatening effusions and pneumothorax (PTX) in dogs. Methods: Five healthy military working dogs (MWDs) and twenty client-owned dogs (22-55 kg) were prospectively enrolled. MWDs were negative for injury for baseline data capture. Client-owned dogs with confirmed abdominal, pleural, pericardial effusion, or PTX were imaged using POCUS. Ultrasound clips were reviewed for quality, curated by experts, converted to image frames from videos, and used to train, optimize, and evaluate different convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures at all FAST scan sites. Results: Models were developed for each scan site with varied performance. Diaphragmatico-hepatic scan site models achieved excellent performance (recall 98%, accuracy 97%) while the pericardial models (recall 87%, accuracy 85%) and chest tube site models (recall 81%, accuracy 88%) demonstrated good performance. The spleno-renal/hepato-renal models (recall 83%, accuracy 78%) and cysto-colic models (recall 84%, accuracy 77%) achieved fair performance. Model prediction overlays confirmed that the models for each site focused on clinically relevant regions during predictions. Discussion: Deep learning models can accurately detect effusion and PTX in canines using POCUS, with variable performance at individual sites. Limitations included small sample sizes, inclusion of only blunt trauma and non-traumatic pathology, class imbalances, and variability in the volume and location of effusion on presentation. Expanding the training datasets and refining pre-training strategies may enhance performance. These findings support the feasibility of AI-assisted ultrasound to augment triage and pre-hospital decision-making in veterinary emergency care.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceeffusionpneumothoraxpoint-of-care diagnosticstraumaultrasound

Identifiers

PMID41884304
PMCPMC13008654

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.